User talk:Vicente2782
Welcome
[edit]
|
BLP
[edit]Hi, I saw you just started an article on one of the Chinese hockey players, Wang Chongwei. When creating articles for people make sure to add the appropriate project banners including the BLP one to to the talk page.--Crossmr (talk) 07:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Wang Chongwei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non notable player that fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 02:16, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Asia League
[edit]China, Japan and Korea all had their own domestic national leagues. However after the financial crisis they ran in to money problems. They wanted to keep hockey alive so they started the Asia league. Japan and China also have national tournaments on top of that. Japan has the all Japan tournament, but beyond that I'm not sure really sure. I don't speak Japanese and haven't had any luck reaching out to Japanese editors. In fact I've had the opposite of luck. Mostly what I've experienced is that those who are interested in Japanese hockey don't really speak English and make drive-by edits from mysterious sources that may or may not turn out to be true, but that's a whole nother discussion that may have to happen at AN/I one day.
As for Korea, they have the Dosmetic Championship which is apparently open to any hockey team who wants to enter, but in practice it's the pro teams and university teams. They also have the Kangwon Cup which is mainly for the university teams and seems to be a replacement for the Divisional Domestic tournament. The KIHL used to be made up of company teams and the university teams all together. They also have an amateur league, which I think halla sponsors now, it was the Jim Paek league. I'd have to check, I don't keep up on that one. They also have a beer league which some ex-pats get involved in.
As for China, I have no idea really. The only english information we get is stuff Bell Metzer writes on NHL.com and the odd story from when the Sharks were involved with them. Beyond that, there isn't a lot of concentrated coverage and my chinese is worse than my non-existent japanese. They had a league as far as I know.. I don't know if it still continues. I don't know if the championship has a league attached to it, but I don't think it does since the teams listed as being involved in it are what make up the current asian league team. Hockey actually has a very long history in China, and they were better in the past, but it has gone down hill bad.
I'm currently working on this for Korea Korea Divisional Domestic Championship, this was a 47 year tournament that shut down almost 10 years ago. and when it's done, I'll probably tackle the Kangwon Cup. Any questions let me know.--Crossmr (talk) 11:01, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- It was a separate tournament. It included things like middle school and high school divisions, the domestic tournament was just everyone together. Which of course the younger divisions had no chance at so they didn't partake. I don't know if the Kangwon Cup still does those divisions or not, I'll look in to it when I get to that article. Unfortunately in the early days newspapers were only a couple pages, so they didn't have a lot of space to editorialize on hockey. Though they did include a large article one year explaining hockey rules and terms and there is the odd photo here and there.--Crossmr (talk) 12:05, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Vicente2782. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The article Wang Chongwei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NHOCKEY
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:12, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Wang Chongwei for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wang Chongwei is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Chongwei (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravenswing 00:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Vicente2782. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)