User talk:Victionarier

Arab Christians

Hi, thanks for pointing that out. You should not use the article as a talk page. Use the talk page instead. Anyways, I will try to fix that problem. Regards.--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 23:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Victionarier, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 23:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Prahlad balaji. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Torpenhow Hill, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 21:31, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Killing Three Warriors with Two Peaches moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Killing Three Warriors with Two Peaches, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 11:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scotched English moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Scotched English, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. lovkal (talk) 19:20, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Scotched English

Hello, Victionarier. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scotched English, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scotched English

The article Scotched English has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, essentially an attack article on that one Scots Wikipedia editor.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HappyWithWhatYouHaveToBeHappyWith (talk) 01:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Scotched English" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Scotched English has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 14 § Scotched English until a consensus is reached. CiphriusKane (talk) 09:37, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scotched English for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scotched English is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scotched English until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]