User talk:Vinay Jayanth

any reason why its a false criticism ?

The link provided by you as a reference for criticism is not a credible link as mere emails cannot be considered as reliable sources for posting information.Similarly,the reference link that was provided earlier for this article was just a blog created by a person.It cannot be considered as a reliable source of information.For example, if a person writes that another person is a criminal does not prove that he/she is a criminal actually.You need to provide a reliable reference link to post any kind of information. --Vinay Jayanth (talk) 11:05, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Jay-Sebastos. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Relief India Trust with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jay _{Σεβαστός}^discuss 11:07, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 30 2015

Hello Vinaya, — Preceding unsigned comment added by DChinu (talk • contribs) 13:52, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the reference are questionable but the truth is the whole article is a written like a advert and most probably by the said organization or paid authoring by the authors who are known to abuse the system and blocked indefinitely.

   Page Creator   : User:Shevakumaran  -  This account has been blocked indefinitely because CheckUser evidence confirms that the operator has abusively used multiple accounts.

   Mjr. Cont      : User:Sneha.M15     -   This account has been confirmed by a Checkuser as a sock puppet of Writer media (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.

                  : User:Elle.k.will   -   This account has been confirmed by a Checkuser as a sock puppet of Writer media (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.

                  :User:Writer media  -   This account has been blocked indefinitely because CheckUser evidence confirms that the operator has abusively used multiple accounts.

                  : User:Kavita1289   -   This account has been confirmed by a Checkuser as a sock puppet of Christinemyers17 (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.

                  : User:Art2edit     -    This account has been confirmed by a Checkuser as a sock puppet of Writer media (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely.

These are the sock puppeteers who wrote this article which misleads and helps the organization continue its malpractice in the field by the help of wikipedia.

                 Current major contributors  Shobhit.v87 and Kakkerifair are most probably same persons/organization carrying out the same abuse.

                  I would most probably include you in the same pool of people who wrote this and profiting from this malpractice.

As for me i raised the criticism as i faced the same alleged malpractice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DChinu (talk • contribs) 13:46, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 1 2015

I do not know who the above users who have been blocked are.Being a wikipedia user,all I know is that as per the policy of wikipedia, references from discussion forums and blogs cannot be used to publish any kind of information on wikipedia.We all should respect the policies of wikipedia and post only reliable information on the internet. --Vinay Jayanth (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 1 2015

Hello, If we adhere to that rule than the following linked portion of the article which being referred by these external references would also ought to be removed

                References 8,9 and 10 links to a local advertising site http://www.vivastreet.co.in/ which are straight out forgery

                References 13 links to a similar local classified site http://www.buildersghar.com/

                Reference 15 leads to another expired/setup website reliefindiatrustngo.com

                Reference 6 leads to Medium.com which is a user posted content (Medium is a blog-publishing platform)  

                Reference 5 leads to the website of the said organization http://www.reliefindiatrust.org/mission.php

Hope you would help to make this article more accurate by the following information.

September 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:25, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vinay Jayanth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock me as I am a user that sometimes come on wiki. There is no question of Sock Puppetry as I am not involved in it. The other users have unnecessarily dragged me into an issue. The users were breaking rules and were against Vandalizing For Relief India Trust, and for that I requested to admin to notice it. Otherwise the admin can check my edits and ID. Visiting different pages and then editing on wiki is my role. If the article page Relief India Trust is in any issue then I would like to clearly mention that I am not a part of it. Why I have mentioned the page is because of that only I am Blocked --Vinay Jayanth (talk) 06:25, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, certainly there's a question of sockpuppetry, enough that you've been blocked for it. Your account has been checked and the technical details match those of Aarvig and possibly others. Your edits also overlap with him on at least one other obscure article. Please read Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KatherineWatts and address the issues raised there. Some transparency is unfortunately required. Kuru (talk) 21:00, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.