User talk:Vontrapp80

Vontrapp80, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Vontrapp80! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roberta Eike has been accepted[edit]

Roberta Eike, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicated references[edit]

Just a note: You appear to have inadvertently duplicated references on Fikile Ntshangase. (I've cleaned up the clutter. Compare the reference list here with 5 distinct sources with this version which has 9 references in the list, 4 of them duplicates.) Typically when a source is used in multiple places in an article, it appears once in the references list with multiple footnotes in the body referencing it. This is done using WP:named references. The reference is spelled out once, and then the named reference tag is inserted wherever needed in the text. In the visual editor, to reuse a reference footnote (the citation tag) just copy and paste the tag (the ^[1]). Don't add the source again through the "add a citation" tool. A source should only have one footnote number, reused wherever needed. – Anon423 (talk) 08:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Student project?[edit]

Hi Vontrapp80, I've noticed a flurry of new activity and editors on a number of pages, including Tanzila Khan. Out of curiosity, are you or the others part of a class or other group initiative? I've noticed a pattern of removing sections before replacing them, which I might recommend against since it leads to annoyances such as duplicated references. Let me know if you have any questions, or perhaps visit the WP:Teahouse for friendly help. – Anon423 (talk) 04:15, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jennie Vanlerberghe (September 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jennie Vanlerberghe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jennie Vanlerberghe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:14, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jennie Vanlerberghe[edit]

Hello, Vontrapp80. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jennie Vanlerberghe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]