User talk:Wadafaqbro

December 2021

Hello, I'm Serols. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nargis, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:08, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nargis. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:08, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chawla, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Chawla was changed by Wadafaqbro (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857219 on 2021-12-27T18:49:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:49, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hard Kaur. Please read the template docs for the Infobox person template {{Infobox person}}. Also, read the WP:OVERLINK page, Wikipedia articles should not be a WP:SEAOFBLUE links. Ravensfire (talk) 16:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wadafaqbro! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. All of your edits have been marked as minor, and the vast majority of them are not. Please use the check box correctly. Ravensfire (talk) 16:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Neetu Singh. NitinMlk (talk) 22:06, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:पंचर पुत्रम कभी ना मित्रम per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prince Of Roblox. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 00:07, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]