User talk:Wayne Riddock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Wayne Riddock, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 02:00, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from VQiPS[edit]

Hello Wayne Riddock, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to VQiPS has been removed. It was removed by Cluu2009 with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Cluu2009 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 01:36, 18 August 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Shanequa jones[edit]

Hi Wayne, thanks for tagging Shanequa jones for deletion. But I noticed you didn't copy the template onto the author's talkpage, May I suggest you do so in future as otherwise the author has no way to find out what happened to their article. Thanks and happy editing! ϢereSpielChequers 16:38, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from Turas faith[edit]

Hello Wayne Riddock, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Turas faith has been removed. It was removed by Edward1967 with the following edit summary '(objection)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Edward1967 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to take part in the article's current AfD. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 20:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

ANSI C12.10[edit]

Hello Wayne, I removed the proposed deletion tag from this article because I thought that a measurement standard for the US was notable enough for article inclusion. I've added an extra reference to the article from Plant Engineering. If you still feel the article should be deleted, please consider taking the article to Articles for Deletion. Thank you. -- Atama 18:52, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

BLP unsourced tag is for unsourced articles only[edit]

I notice your edit added BLP unsourced tag to an article that has sources. Please don't add BLP unsourced tag indiscriminantly. Please note, external links in articles can be sources, and this article had external link to IMDB.com article about the person. You can make other complaints, such as using "BLP refimprove" tag, but it is not unsourced. --doncram (talk) 18:15, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Comexi Group[edit]

Hello I have rewritten the entry of Comexi Group, you have to check to remove the warning? Pictograf (talk) 13:54, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Marie Stopes International[edit]

The SPUC is a perfectly fine source and the citation does clearly support the conclusion that Marie Stopes International engages in illegal abortions abroad. I even used essentially the same wording as used in the article, to be as accurate as possible. Duckelf (talk) 20:44, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

About information you removed[edit]

Here - it was added by one of my students as part of the assignment (they are supposed to add a constructive edit to a page of their choice). I have a favor to ask - could you explain to the student why the information was removed, so they can learn from their mistakes? Thanks, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 02:09, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

The edit did not appear constructive in a very generalised article as it appeared to mention a specific course without any clue as to why this course was notable enough to be included. . . Wayne Riddock (talk) 09:57, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Brand Keys[edit]

Dear Wayne Riddock,

We saw your edit on the Brand Keys page and have rewritten the page. Could you look again and see this rewrite? It says a user has flagged it as advertisement and that we should contact and talk to the user in order to get it removed. I hope this is the right step and my apologies if not. Thank you for your time!

- Chester Mountain —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.249.135 (talk) 14:11, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

It still reads rather like an advertisement: - too much content promoting the organisation and not enough describing its history and why it is notable enough to deserve being the subject of an article in Wikipedia. . . Wayne Riddock (talk) 15:05, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)