User talk:Webnetprof

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Webnetprof, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Merbabu (talk) 10:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

As this is the 21st century and english wikipedia - considerable number of words in your article are old spelling Satu Suro 11:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

In view of the shady nature of Joop's involvement in Indonesian history - please provide more citations - as the supposed connections are not as definite as asserted in the article as it stands - please provide closer/tighter refs - thank you Satu Suro 12:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed

You have not replied - or offered more specific citations so I have placed 'Disputed' at the article - I am sorry but my sources suggest that most of his claims (Joop Beek) are not verifiable and as a consequence the claims are disputable - and should be removed from the article.

Wikipedia takes WP:V and WP:RS seriously - anecdotal unsupported statements about the individuals role in Indonesian history require either much closer citations or reversion. Thanks Satu Suro 14:56, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've been busy with some other chores, but I'll look into it and hope some others will too.

Thanks Webnetprof (talk) 03:46, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thats fine - it is very very tricky when someone claims to have been a prime mover in Indonesian politics when no one mentioned the person in the time that one would have expected serious research would have mentioned him. The thing is the source that you have mentioned need to be cited from with some care - as the issue of WP:UNDUE emphasis on the claim of the presence of the person can be made.

If the sources you have used have easily quotable items that assist the argument of the article as it stands - that is fine - however from the perspective our checking traditionally accepted historical material it is simply a fabrication by an old man - we need more than his claims to ascertain the veracity for remaining in mainspace wikipedia Satu Suro 08:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm AldezD. Your recent edit to the page Auschwitz concentration camp appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AldezD (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. ann Frank was indisputably an inmate at Auschwitz. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Franz Böhme may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* 16 September 1941 – 2 December 1941: At the same time, Commanding General and Commander of [[Serbia]; he ordered the repisals executions of 2,000 communists and Jews in Topola after a

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kindertransport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barry Turner. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

World War II casualties ‎

Hi Webnetprof, I noticed your edit on World War II casualties where you changed the number of deaths from 210,000 to 275,000. I didn't see any source for this change, and based on the values 6,700, 187,300 and 16,000 I think 210,000 is correct. If you want to reinstate your change, I would appreciate if you could explain with a reliable source. Thanks. – NJD-DE (talk) 10:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mountain View Historical Association

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mountain View Historical Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 19:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed

Thank you for your expansion at the Warsaw Voice, but please add sources. Unsourced additions can be removed as unverified. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:31, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're right.. did it. maybe not the perfect format, I'm not so good at that. Thanks for your suggestion. Webnetprof Webnetprof (talk) 12:03, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Webnetprof. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Arthur Graaff, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Blablubbs. I think I get it, but it seems a bit complicated although I think my professional background as a writer will help to stay neutral. Luckily a lot of people have looked over this article (including some less neutral). I hope the number of refs is sufficient by now - that sometimes takes a bit of time. Webnetprof (talk) 15:46, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for responding. To clarify: What is your connection to Arthur Graaff? --Blablubbs (talk) 16:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blablubbs,

There 's no question about is: Webnetprof = Arthur Graaff. He has admitted this in the past on Dutch Wikipedia.

Arthur Graaff was also for many years spokesperson of the AFVN - a Dutch pro Putin splinter gruep, who's activities Webnetprof promotes.

The person behind Webnetprof has used also different IP-addresses to work on the Arthur Graaff-page or to answer questions. See:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2001:1C02:10E:A600:9C3B:4649:E219:D613

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2001:1C02:10E:A600:C4D8:29F1:841E:6047

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2001:1C02:10E:A600:4463:3CF0:B4FD:EA64

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2001:1C02:10E:A600:4C74:E0AE:AE1E:7E5A

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/93.117.253.102

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2A02:A450:2D2C:1:25E2:317:A86B:7385

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2001:1C02:10E:A600:BC2B:EA24:7378:C634

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2A02:A450:2D2C:1:198B:6FBD:2337:441A

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2001:1C02:10E:A600:C8F2:15AA:766A:F978

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2001:1C02:10E:A600:250D:56E6:E23F:2C24

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2001:1C02:10E:A600:B0D3:75CF:EB96:566F

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2A02:A450:2D2C:1:543F:A20F:7F60:6D4D

See for more aliases and IP-addresses used by the person behind Webnetprof: https://www.droog-mag.nl/2020/ag/pseudoniemen.html

That source is a site of a left wing Dutch journalist, who reports critically about Mr. Graaff's activities, since the latter falsely claimed to be appointed as a special UN rapporteur in 2020. John A. Drummond (talk) 10:49, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blablubbs & John Dtummond,

It is no secret that Webnetprof is me. I used the old Dutch well-editied article on me that was featured in the Dutch WP for six years (hence the photograph in the database) to start this article. A number of others have contributed in the mean time, also critically (fine). But do not accuse me of falsely claiming anything without proof. Here is the proof of the designation as Rapporteur TO the UN: 'Antifascist Arthur Graaff benoemd tot rapporteur nazisme voor VN' ('Anti-fascist Arthur Graaff appointed as rapporteur on Nazism TO UN') and the article states that there are six leftist Dutch organizations that named me. https://www.afvn.nl/antifascist-rapporteur-vn/ This was then framed by opponents as 'BY' the UN. Not much came of it because of Covid that had just started then.

One of my critics has been waging a campaign about me for over 2.5 years now, and I have lodged a criminal complaint against him for slander. But currently the police doesn't do much with that kind of cases.

In the mean time, others and I have added as many refs as possible. I trust that will do it.

Thank you.

Webnetprof (talk) 17:07, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Given your removal and/or distortion of all serious critical notes by third parties on the Arthur Graaff page, and your use of a whole range of different IP addresses, I have no confidence in it. John A. Drummond (talk) 19:53, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.. I think it's in everyone's interest that we get this cleared up ASAP so we can ensure the article remains in good standing. JeffUK 10:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arthur Graaff for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arthur Graaff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Graaff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

- Who is John Galt? ✉ 02:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arthur Graaff, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages NRC and NPO.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Partial block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing the article Arthur Graaff because you have chosen to ignore the conflict of interest guideline, despite the facts that you have been informed of that guideline, and that you have made posts both on this page and elsewhere which made it clear that you were aware of it.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:JBW (talk) 17:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have been evading the block by means of IP editing. That is rather unfair of you, because obviously your spam article will now have to be protected, to prevent you from doing the same again, and, as you must know, that may cause inconvenience for one or more legitimate editors, as well as preventing your abusive editing. Also, if I see that you try again to evade the partial block I shall place a total block on your account. JBW (talk) 11:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]