User talk:Whh990
![]() | Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. |
Extended content
|
---|
Unblock Request[edit]![]() Whh990 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Nancy has created this problem, I would like to get back to editing normally, how I was on the 26th of November 2010. Whh990 (talk) 12:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC) Decline reason: WP:Standard offer has been made to you several times, however it does not work while you continue denying all the problems with your editing and blaming others. Max Semenik (talk) 12:31, 15 June 2012 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Things that prove that I am innocent;
I would also like and explanation from her as to why she is so interested in me. As there is no reason why making an edit to a high traffic article should result in years of harassment. Another question for Nancy, if I hadn't edited the London page, or you has just got on with your normal editing, do you think that the Groton Wood account would still have been created on the 13th of January 2011 or do you think it was your harassment and blocks. What I can't understand is why you appeared to want to help me and say "I appreciate that all your edits are being made in absolute good faith and that you are genuinely here for the good of the project" and then you do this, however even if you get involved with someone who is not editing in good faith, you still have no right to be abusive towards them, it is your responsibility as an administrator that you use your privileges fairly (especially with less experienced users). As for your advice, I understand that maps and photos aren’t generally appropriate, as synthesis also is not allowed. I have also learnt how to use co-ordinates. Redirects, templates and categories, I now agree that we shouldn't even have redirects for transport in.., transport for.. or for unlisted houses (we could redirect every pupil to their primary school, even though that would be verifiable, which would violate WP:Notdir) even it a very small settlement, however I would say redirects for non-notable Grade II listed buildings are acceptable (if the building may be notable, then there should be a red link instead of a redirect). As for templates and categories, I think it's acceptable to have templates and categories for civil parishes as long as there are more notable features in them that just the settlements (which would be covered in the district's template/category), however we don't need templates/categories for hamlets as the listed buildings in the hamlet will redirect to the hamlet or a list so they would be redundant. Another note, I got a kitten for creating a good article on a place in Staffordshire (back in July). Whh990 (talk) 12:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Hamish, I don't think I have anything useful to add to what has been said, exhaustively, by me and by others at your primary account's talk. Kind regards, nancy 16:08, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
|
ArbCom unblock appeal
[edit]The Arbitration Committee has carefully considered the user's appeal and has declined to unblock at this time. After six months of not editing Wikipedia under any account including IP accounts the user may again apply to have the block reviewed.
For the Arbitration Committee. SilkTork ✔Tea time 08:49, 27 December 2012 (UTC)