Jump to content

User talk:Wi en.Pa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wi en.Pa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Draft:Laura J. Pagett did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. 

Help me![edit]

Please help me with... Dear Wikis,

I would like to ask, if you could proof my latest publication. I've added links to proof, that I am writing about a real person. Wi en.Pa (talk) 11:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC) Wi en.Pa (talk) 11:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See below - RichT|C|E-Mail 12:45, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like Padgett has a page on de.wiki; perhaps you could try translating some portion of it to increase your draft's chances of getting accepted. 78.28.44.111 (talk) 13:09, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura J. Pagett (June 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please make sure your draft is ready for submission before submitting it. The Background, Teaching.. etc etc sections should have content in them. Also the references provided are primary sources, we need secondary reliable, verifiable sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- RichT|C|E-Mail 12:42, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Wi en.Pa! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - RichT|C|E-Mail 12:42, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura J. Padgett (June 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Wikipedia is not an artist directory entry. Needs external news sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura J. Padgett (July 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 05:45, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura J. Padgett has been accepted[edit]

Laura J. Padgett, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 09:13, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Laura J. Padgett does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:09, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you undo my changes?[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Laura J. Padgett, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I am trying to help you by improving the article you created, so that it conforms better to Wikipedia's standards. But twice you've undid my changes without an explanation? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:13, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

Please help me with... Hi I have three questions: 1. Can you please change Eatly Life to Early Life in Laura J. Padgett? 2. Can you please link the Laura J. Padgett Article with the Peter Zumthor Article regarding the Photographs Laura J. Padgett made for Thinking Architecture? [1] "In Thinking Architecture Peter Zumthor expresses his motivation in designing buildings that have an emotional connection and possess a powerful and unmistakable presence and personality. It is illustrated throughout with color photographs by Laura Padgett of Zumthor's new home and studio in Haldenstein. " 3. May I add an image of Padgett's work? Wi en.Pa (talk) 15:40, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Wi en.Pa (talk) 15:40, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Partly done: fixed the heading typo and added the wikilink. Leaving the help request open for someone more confident in their knowledge of fair use (or requesting copyright permissions). Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Zumthor
As for you adding photos by Padgett, that would likely be a copyright violation. If the copyright holder, presumably Padgett, agreed to license the photos with a license compatible with Wikipedia's licensing, she could upload those photos to Wikimedia Commons. There are tutorial instructions for doing this at: Commons:First steps. Once uploaded and properly licensed, it would be possible to use them in the article, just as you would use any other image from Commons. But whoever does this needs to be fully aware of the very broad set of usages that a Wikipedia-compatible license would allow.
Given that Padgett holds the copyright to the photos you wish to use, and only photos by Padgett will suit your illustration needs, I do not see any way that there could be a successful fair use justification. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 03:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

Please help me with... Thank you very much for your assistance with the article on Laura J. Padgett Is it possible to remove the orphan tag now, even thought there is only one Wiki link to the Peter Zumthor article? I will look for other possible links. Thank you. I see now what you mean about copyright problems. Even if I ask the artist, there is no way to have proof that she has agreed. Thanks again Wi en.Pa (talk) 13:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC) (Wi_en.Pa) Wi en.Pa (talk) 13:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Padgett can email us (instructions linked in previous section), but we only accept media that allow for commercial reuse. Considering that she earns a living from her work, it's quite unlikely she would release her work under those terms, so we can't use it. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 14:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

Please help me with... THANKS AGAIN!! Wi en.Pa (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2020 (UTC) Wi en.Pa (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 18:15, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wi_en.Pa&oldid=977527262"