User talk:Wikieditor6557

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Wikieditor6557! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! aboideau^{sapere aude} 18:00, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Faraci

Hi Wikieditor6557. Can I just ask you why you blanked the Paul Faraci redirect? Thegreatluigi (talk) 02:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m working on expanding his article Wikieditor6557 (talk) 02:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I figured it'd be either that, or you were thinking the redirect should be deleted. Well, just a heads up, in future, if you want to expand a redirect out like that, you might be better off drafting it in draftspace (see WP:UD), or in your sandbox, and then copying it over, rather than leaving the redirect page completely blank. You also might want to consider using edit summaries, so annoying busybodies like me don't badger you on your talk page...

Incidentally, you are aware that Paul Faraci used to have an article, and it was deleted because he wasn't considered notable, right? (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Paul_Faraci), Thegreatluigi (talk) 02:42, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of that. However the article that he had before had no references or information about him. I’m adding the proper references so it meets the notability guidelines. Wikieditor6557 (talk) 02:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of that. However, the article that had been there before had no references or information about him. I’m adding the proper references so it meets the notability guidelines. Wikieditor6557 (talk) 03:12, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. The only reason I asked was because you were starting from scratch instead of building off of what was there before, but now that I think about it, starting from scratch is probably the best way to go about it. Clearly, you're already way better than me at this, and I ought to leave before I accidentally say something else patronising. Good luck with the new article. Thegreatluigi (talk) 03:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’m probably not better than you, I just thought that nobody would see if I didn’t do it in a draft because this page is rarely edited. Thanks! Wikieditor6557 (talk) 03:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrik Jordan Mathews

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Patrik Jordan Mathews requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kpg jhp jm 07:53, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question

You have responses.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions •

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Wikieditor6557 (talk) 03:56, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]