User talk:Wikiforever2012

Welcome!

Hello, Wikiforever2012, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:36, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment on Dallas Museum of Art, please use the sandbox. Thank you....Modernist (talk) 15:46, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Dallas Museum of Art, you may be blocked from editing. ...Modernist (talk) 16:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Museum in Dallas the painting remains in its collection...Modernist (talk) 16:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care where you think you work or who you think you are - the curatorial department at the Dallas Museum confirms that the works remain in the collection. Do not remove them until you have proof in the form of a valid reference showing the de-acquisitioning of those works...Modernist (talk) 17:09, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Dallas Museum of Art. ...Modernist (talk) 17:12, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War

If you wish to continue this crusade against the article - continue on the articles talk page and read this: WP:EDITWAR, you are over the edge...Modernist (talk) 17:15, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

El Greco

Continue your incorrect ranting here, but speak to the Museum registrar first: [1], thanks...Modernist (talk) 17:34, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Aerial view of the Dallas Museum of Art July 2012.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Aerial view of the Dallas Museum of Art July 2012.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:05, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]