User talk:WildCasterWolhuter

Speedy deletion nomination of Kim Wolhuter

A tag has been placed on Kim Wolhuter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kingpin¹³ (talk) 13:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Kim Wolhuter

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Kim Wolhuter. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 13:44, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Kim Wolhuter. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 13:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Kim Wolhuter. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —SpaceFlight89 13:47, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Kim Wolhuter

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Kim Wolhuter. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 13:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Kim Wolhuter. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. WuhWuzDat 13:49, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kim Wolhuter

A tag has been placed on Kim Wolhuter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WuhWuzDat 13:53, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Kim Wolhuter

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Kim Wolhuter. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 13:53, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Kim Wolhuter. —SpaceFlight89 13:54, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with Kim Wolhuter, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WuhWuzDat 13:54, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are currently blocked for 31 hours for removal of the speedy deletion tag, despite multiple warnings not to do so. I urge you to look at our policies and guidelines and try to conform. If you continue down this line, you may end up blocked indefinitely from editing. Syrthiss (talk) 14:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]