User talk:Willsteve2000

AfC notification: Draft:Curtis and Jones Company Shoe Factory has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Curtis and Jones Company Shoe Factory. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:55, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Curtis and Jones Company Shoe Factory has been accepted

Curtis and Jones Company Shoe Factory, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of DistrictBuilder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DistrictBuilder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DistrictBuilder (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— Mhawk10 (talk) 01:10, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Erie County, Ohio

added a link pointing to Erie County

Erie County, Pennsylvania

added a link pointing to Erie County

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erie County, Ohio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erie County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Can I have some help please

Alright me old mucker :)

I proposed an AFD nomination on Death and state funeral of George H.W. Bush but it didn't format the same way ur nomination of Gorbachev did, or create a page where people can vote like yours. Please can u tell me how to fix it? Stephanie921 (talk) 20:51, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

@Stephanie921 Sure, what I did is followed the instructions at WP:AFDHOWTO, which will do a deletion nomination (I think what happened to the George Bush article is a deletion proposal instead of a nomination). Basically, by adding "{{subst:afd1}}" at the top of the article and saving, it'll create a link where it says "deletion discussion page" that will allow you to nominate the article, open the discussion, and add your reason into it. The instructions are a bit complex, but not too hard to follow. Hope this helps! - Willsteve2000 (talk) 21:13, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Tyvm - did I do it right? I can't tell. It has the same page formatting but the link on the template is clickable but red. And it's got code at bottom Stephanie921 (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

@Stephanie921 Yes, that's correct. You'd have to click on the red link to create the discussion page (step II of WP:AFDHOWTO).

Also, as mentioned by 331dot in the revision history for the page, a merge proposal might be better than a deletion nomination. When I did the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Mikhail Gorbachev nomination, there wasn't (and still really isn't) any additional content on the article other than what was written on the main Mikhail Gorbachev article, whereas the Bush article has a fair amount of substantive content on it that would have to be merged if the article is removed, although I feel like the Bush article has reached a point where there's enough information to warrant a separate article on his death/funeral. I'd recommend instead doing deletion proposals on articles without a significant amount of information where it would be more suitable to merge articles, such as Death and state funeral of Heydar Aliyev and Death and funeral of Donald Dewar. Willsteve2000 (talk) 21:37, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Awesome, ty. Personally I think the content on the Bush funeral is substantive enough to warrant an entire article. I meant anything that can be in the article should ideally go in the main one, although I'm not arguing for a merge. I just think an entire article is repetitive and not notable. Feel free to suggest thoughts on page if u disagree Stephanie921 (talk) 21:49, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

I've done it now btw!! Tysm :D Feel free to discuss on page Stephanie921 (talk) 23:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Looks good! I'm currently leaning towards keep on that particular article, just because of how substantive the article is, but will comment if I have anything to add. - Willsteve2000 (talk) 23:19, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Awesome :D I'm extremely proud of myself and I couldn't have done it without you Stephanie921 (talk) 23:27, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

please withdraw nomination

Death of Mikhail Gorbachev deletion 2A00:1FA0:46C9:1807:0:6B:63FD:5F01 (talk) 09:35, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

@2A00:1FA0:46C9:1807:0:6B:63FD:5F01 Why? Is there a specific reason? If so, I'd recommend adding it to your response to the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of Mikhail Gorbachev, as it currently has WP:NOREASON. Either way, I am unable to withdraw the nomination as doing so requires unanimous keep support and no ongoing discussions (see WP:CLOSEAFD). Willsteve2000 (talk) 15:24, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Willsteve2000. Thank you for creating Lindener Butjer. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:57, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:DistrictBuilder

Hello, Willsteve2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DistrictBuilder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Since 1789, many full-term representatives weren't sworn in, the day their terms began

Howdy. Concerning the notes, just wanted to point out. Not every post-20th amendment Congress began on January 3. But we still use January 3, as the starting date for terms. After all, it would kinda look strange showing (for example) that Pelosi ceased to be a representative on January 3, 2023 & then became a representative 'again' on January 7, 2023. GoodDay (talk) 07:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

@GoodDay Hello there! While I agree that January 3rd should remain the starting date listed for their terms due to the 20th Amendment, I believe it would be appropriate to add a note for the new members of the House in this 118th Congress to note that they were sworn in at a later date. I am not suggesting or advocating for changing the starting date, or changing anything on the articles for re-elected members who have served in previous sessions of Congress, but rather just a small note on the articles of the new house members to indicate that the date they were first sworn in is different to the date they started the position, as they were still technically considered members-elect until they were sworn in. While including such a note has not not been done for members of other sessions of Congress, this is also the first post-20th Amendment Congress in which the election of a Speaker delayed the swearing in of new members. - Willsteve2000 (talk) 08:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Just pointing out, starting dates/swearing in date being different is very common in the history of the US House & Senate, since 1789. Indeed before the 20th amendment, Congressional (House & Senate) terms began on March 4, but members didn't get sworn in until nine months later, in December. GoodDay (talk) 08:15, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:DistrictBuilder

Hello, Willsteve2000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DistrictBuilder".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)