User talk:Wiswright

May 2023

Hello, Wiswright. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. XOR'easter (talk) 17:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You stated that the relevance is not established. How could an in-depth, pier reviewed conceptual statement of the second law not be relevant to the second law? I am not creating articles about myself, my family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors; nor do I work for any organization or have a conflict of interest. I am not advertising, publicizing, or promoting. Wiswright (talk) 19:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When your user name contains "wright" and you repeatedly cite papers by an S. E. Wright, it naturally raises concerns. XOR'easter (talk) 21:13, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to the page Stardust

I reverted your edit to the page Stardust. The page in question is a disambiguation page and should only include links to articles it is disambiguating. Even if your addition is valid content, it should belong in one of the actual articles, not on the disambiguation page. JIP | Talk 15:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, didn't realize it was a disambiguation page....any idea what page this would be a good fit for, or to compare to? Wiswright (talk) 18:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, not at the moment. JIP | Talk 19:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stardust and Nucleosynthesis

Hello, Wiswright. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stardust and Nucleosynthesis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stardust and Nucleosynthesis

Hello, Wiswright. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Stardust and Nucleosynthesis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]