User talk:Wolfpack1999

This is Wolfpack1999's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thinking outside the box and 5W1H (July 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by TheLonelyPather was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not for essays or how-tos (see WP:NOTESSAY). This draft, unfortunately, is not to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 07:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for the explanation. 'How-to' article is not allow.

I want to add the motivation and self-improve company profile. What the requirement so that it stay neutral. Wolfpack1999 (talk) 07:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wolfpack1999! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 07:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Wolfpack1999/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Wolfpack1999/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.velaction.com/5w1h/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Thinking outside the box and 5W1H

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Thinking outside the box and 5W1H requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.velaction.com/5w1h/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:57, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Wolfpack1999/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Wolfpack1999/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.vrangesync.com. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

other than the 'statistic.png' which is copyright. what other are copyright on the article?

do i need to re-write the article to be wiki-friendly?

it is a file synicronzation application. not a web hosting service. can you verify on the site again?

the speed comparison on youtube are proof of concept from the vrangesync.

need more advice. Thank you for vetting it through. Wolfpack1999 (talk) 10:51, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 16:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

in regard block

reason given is : Using Wikipedia for spam or advertising purposes first article was on 'self-help' on 'sandbox' the latest article was for a business company in the 'sandbox' and seek advice from respective 'mentor' Need senior administrator to look into what went wrong and why they think it is a spam or advertising? Wolfpack1999 (talk) 10:05, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to appeal your block, you need to do so as instructed in the block notice, otherwise your appeal is unlikely to be seen by the administrators. I don't know what a "senior administrator" is, I guess for reasons of natural age or service tenure some are more 'senior' than others, but rest assured they all have the same tools and authorities, and all are skilled at applying them.

Note that your drafts have been not only inappropriate for Wikipedia (as already pointed out, we don't publish self-help or promotional content), but in each case also copyright violations. The message you received the first time this happened clearly says that persistent violators will be blocked from editing, and yet you chose to repeat this two more times. If you decide to lodge an appeal, you should probably address these points as well as the stated reason for your block. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:16, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just post in sandbox and next thing i message my mentor 'estar' for advice to check if it appropriate. i did not even post in the public wiki. the helpdesk administrator ask to post in the talkpage . is there a problem posting thing in the sandbox? Wolfpack1999 (talk) 06:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

would you mind get senior wikipedian to verify if posting in the 'sandbox' will be fine?

'sandbox' suppose to be a 'testing ground' and get approval from moderator before release to public. Wolfpack1999 (talk) 12:33, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you cannot post content that violates someone's copyright anywhere, including any sandbox page, because copyright violations are against the law. Every page on Wikipedia is freely available to visitors, so whether you publish in the encyclopaedia or in 'your' sandbox, either way you are publishing.

Besides, this is all rather academic now, given that you are blocked, and cannot therefore publish anything anywhere other than this talk page. (And you should only be editing this page to appeal your block.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:53, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

are you referring to the copyright content related to 'vrangesync.com'? i can get the webmaster/administrator's permission from 'vrangesync.com' site.

' Star Mississippi' give the reason as: reason given is : Using Wikipedia for spam or advertising purposes

i need to know what other stuffs i need to be aware of when publish article. Wolfpack1999 (talk) 00:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if you have a relationship with the webmaster, you should not be editing about it anywhere (see WP:COI) in addition to the copyright and advertising.

Thanks @DoubleGrazing for handling while I was offline. Star Mississippi 01:36, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

you use the word 'if' as an assumption. What is 'sandbox' suppose to be? isn't 'sandbox' suppose to be a 'testing ground' and get approval from moderator before release to public. i have yet receive a reply from my mention 'estar' after i have posted in the sandbox for her/his review and the ban came in and reason is :spam and advertising. Wolfpack1999 (talk) 11:37, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair warning: you are running close to having your talk page privileges revoked by an admin. As a blocked user, you should only be editing this page to appeal your block (as I've already stated before), not for pettifogging about the purpose of sandboxes or what word Star Mississippi may have used (or rather, what your interpretation of it may be). Either appeal your block, or don't, but cease this malarkey. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While the sandbox has fewer rules than other pages on Wikipedia, that doesn't mean it has no rules. You can't make personal attacks, add promotional material, or commit copyright violations anywhere on Wikipedia, including a sandbox page. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 13:41, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

star mississippi using the word 'if' as an assumption. Wolfpack1999 (talk) 11:38, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]