User talk:WooleySheep323

Welcome![edit]

Hi WooleySheep323! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! —C.Fred (talk) 14:30, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No small tags at all in infobox[edit]

Convention is to not have small tags at all in the infobox, so rather than convert the raw HTML to {{small}} tags, it's better to just remove them. —C.Fred (talk) 14:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It would be good if you to take a survey on {{infobox airline}} so that you familiarise yourself with the different fields of the template before making further edits to airline articles.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 00:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rheintalflug (January 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two source, neither of which meets the WP:GNG standard, is not enough to satisfy WP:NCORP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rheintalflug and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WooleySheep323! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:08, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You are blocked due to behavioural evidence suggesting that you are evading numerous other blocks of a long term disruptive editor.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 17:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=I was just organizing. WooleySheep323 (talk) 21:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]