User talk:Wotalot

February 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ed Westwick has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ed Westwick was changed by Wotalot (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2016-02-06T16:51:36+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:51, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alec Baldwin. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alec Baldwin was changed by Wotalot (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969389 on 2016-02-06T16:56:02+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ed Westwick with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:58, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alec Baldwin. Sundayclose (talk) 16:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Louise baldpasty

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Louise baldpasty, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 17:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]