Jump to content

User talk:Wouter at KTH

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Microvalve (February 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
EROS message 07:08, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello, Wouter at KTH! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 07:08, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Microvalve has been accepted

[edit]
Microvalve, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kees08 (Talk) 08:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution, looks to be a good addition. Kees08 (Talk) 08:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Wouter at KTH. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Emergence, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

I am referring to this edit: [1]. I'd be happy to help if you have any questions. This is not, by the way, a dig at the quality of your work. It looks very interesting to me! But you will need to respect process in order to be a successful contributor to Wikipedia.

Best wishes, Generalrelative (talk) 16:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]