User talk:Wouter at KTH
This is Wouter at KTH's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Microvalve (February 28)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Microvalve and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Microvalve, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Wouter at KTH!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 07:08, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Microvalve has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Kees08 (Talk) 08:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)Thank you for your contribution, looks to be a good addition. Kees08 (Talk) 08:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Wouter at KTH. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Emergence, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.
I am referring to this edit: [1]. I'd be happy to help if you have any questions. This is not, by the way, a dig at the quality of your work. It looks very interesting to me! But you will need to respect process in order to be a successful contributor to Wikipedia.
Best wishes, Generalrelative (talk) 16:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)