Jump to content

User talk:Xave2000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned non-free image File:P Pakeman - Program Insert '87 - North York Rockets.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:P Pakeman - Program Insert '87 - North York Rockets.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Once the OTRS ticket is processed a volunteer sysop that has OTRS access (not me, sorry) will restore the image with the appropriate ticket number. It may take some time for this as there is often a backlog. Skier Dude (talk) 00:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

COMMENT

[edit]

The Cdn Soccer League has been contacted. The copyright status will be updated accordingly, if a favourable decision is made. Xave2000 (talk)

Possibly unfree File:Peter Pakeman - Senior Bowl Selection Letter.pdf

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peter Pakeman - Senior Bowl Selection Letter.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:43, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proceed with deletion

[edit]

A reliable published reference has been found, so this pdf file can be deleted.Xave2000 (talk)

Possibly unfree File:P Pakeman - OSA Letter '78 - U18 Provincial Team.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:P Pakeman - OSA Letter '78 - U18 Provincial Team.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:44, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Peter Pakeman - OMSA Letter '76 - U16 Provincial Team.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peter Pakeman - OMSA Letter '76 - U16 Provincial Team.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Peter Pakeman - OMSA Letter '74 - Adidas Skills Contest.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peter Pakeman - OMSA Letter '74 - Adidas Skills Contest.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peter Pakeman for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Pakeman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Pakeman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Jreferee (talk) 15:06, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Peter Pakeman (Cornell University 1982).jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peter Pakeman (Cornell University 1982).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Jreferee (talk) 15:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Toronto Jets S.S. Pauline (1978).pdf

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Toronto Jets S.S. Pauline (1978).pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Jreferee (talk) 15:25, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:North York Rockets Program Insert (August 1987).pdf listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:North York Rockets Program Insert (August 1987).pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- Jreferee (talk) 15:36, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Xave2000/Peter Pakeman, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Xave2000/Peter Pakeman and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Xave2000/Peter Pakeman during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Jreferee (talk) 16:13, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proceed with Deletion

[edit]

Xave2000 (talk) 16:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please remember that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Peter Pakeman. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please do not blank articles, especially, as you are not the sole contributor to the article. The proper way to request an article to be deleted, where there are multiple significant contributors is through a standard WP:AfD deletion request. As there is one such request already open on this article, you should participate in it. In the future, if you are the only significant contributor to a page and wish to have it deleted, you may use the {{db-author}} template on those pages. -- 76.65.131.217 (talk) 08:39, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the same person as InPerpetuity (talk · contribs) ? -- 76.65.131.217 (talk) 08:41, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reply to question

[edit]

No I am not, but I have and did work closely with the subject of the article, as you can tell.Xave2000 (talk) 15:19, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Challenge Deletion of article Peter Pakeman

[edit]

I've been away and unable to participate in discussions. How do I go about challenging the decision? Xave2000 (talk) 15:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you could file for a deletion review at WP:DRV. Why do you think the discussion was closed incorrectly? Mark Arsten (talk) 17:42, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Mark, I would like address this in a short discussion, if you think it is appropriate to include it hear. I would also be interested in hearing your opinion about the format, as the article was not intended to be a biography. Other published articles about athletes tended to be dry reading, which is why I wrote it like a short story/ biography. Thank you. Xave2000 (talk) 15:25, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mark, I’ve revisited the criteria for an athlete in Wikipedia:Notability (sports) and would like to challenge to the decision and have the it reversed, because I'm confident that the subject of the article meets one or more of Wiki’s notability requirements: (1) Association football (soccer); and (2) Amateur sports person/ College athlete. Clearly, the subject of the article is not a super-star. He is not famous or popular. His professional career was brief, similar to the subjects of other Wikipedia articles. Unlike the subjects of other articles, whose notability could be viewed as a flash-in-the-pan, because of the few references they may contain, the success this subject has been referenced as one that has been sustained over a period of approximately 10-15 years. In your deliberations I would ask that you keep in mind the saying that “the sum of the parts is greater than the whole.” Below are the relevant criteria and an explanation about how they are met by the subject of the article Association football (soccer) - Players who have appeared in a fully professional league (list of fully professional leagues kept by WikiProject Football), will generally be regarded as notable. EXPLANATION- The subject of the article was a call-up, and played three games with the North York Rockets in the Canadian Soccer League (CSL). Youth players are not notable unless they satisfy one of the statements above. EXPLANATION- As an amateur (youth), the subject of the article played with the Toronto Falcons and Toronto Italia in the National Soccer League (NSL), a professional soccer league in Canada that existed from 1926 to 1997. In 1977 and 1978, he played with the Toronto Jets, a farm team to the Toronto Falcons and Toronto Italia. During those years he was called-up to play on the parent teams. Amateur sports persons- College athletes are notable if they have been the subject of non-trivial media coverage beyond merely a repeating of their statistics, mentions in game summaries, or other coverage. EXPLANATION- In his senior year (1983), the subject of the article he received an individual award at the national level, by being selected to play at the ISAA Senior Soccer Bowl Classic, a forum where top college soccer players could compete in an all-star game and where professional soccer scouts could come to see America's best players. Both the NCCA and the ISAA also have longstanding roots in sports. However, unlike the NCAA, which has its roots in rowing and football, the ISSA, which was founded in 1926, was created for and supported soccer, only. The first NCCA, All-American award/selection occurred in 1973, a year after the first ISAA the Senior Soccer Bowl Classic game was played. While the NCAA All-American award may be more widely recognized, individuals selected to play in the ISAA the Senior Soccer Bowl Classic were also being recognized at the national level. Notwithstanding the fact that the some of the article's references came under scrutiny, they were credible/ non-trivial sources related to the subject: playing with the North York Rockets in the Canadian Soccer League (CSL); and being recognized at the national-level by playing in the ISAA the Senior Soccer Bowl Classic. (Note #1: The subject of the article assures me that he is confident he can obtain the appropriate permission for the recently deleted reference that confirms he played with the North York Rockets. Note #2: The subject of the article also assures me that another reference can be provided to confirm his selection to playing in the ISAA the Senior Soccer Bowl Classic.)Xave2000 (talk) 17:51, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]