User talk:Xenarc
October 2019
[edit]
If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
{{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Xenarc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
No one is shouting. ITS JUST FRUSTRATING THAT PEOPLE BLOCKING ME DON'T EVEN DO THEIR HOMEWORK
- Using capital letters is considered shouting and is rude. Please stop doing so. WP:GAB will help you understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 17:18, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Why do I need to do all this madness just to get unblocked. Wikipedia really is losing valuable information missing from its pages because of people like you. CAPITAL LETTERS ARE RUDE???? WOW.. .ARE YOU THE PRESIDENT OF WIKIPEDIA?? EMOTIONS PLAY A PART HERE?????? WHAT MADNESS?@!!!!!!! YOU PEOPLE ARE GIVEN TOO MUCH POWER TO JUST BAN ANYONE IT IS RIDICULOUS>
You were warned. Talk page access revoked. This leaves you with WP:UTRS. I strongly suggest you read WP:GAB and WP:COI before making a request there. --Yamla (talk) 17:23, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Xenarc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #27306 was submitted on Oct 25, 2019 17:37:18. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 17:37, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- Existence is not enough to warrant mention on Wikipedia. A company must be notable to be considered worthy of inclusion. Lack of a standalone article is reason enough to exclude it from any list.
- We consider evidence from reliable sources that are independent of the company to judge if it is worthy of inclusion.
- Wikipedia is not interested in what a company's representatives want to say about it. Readers expect neutral articles, written independently of their subject and sourced reliably, not corporate promotional pieces.
- Your account name violates Wikipedia's username policy, which disallows accounts from being named after companies or organizations. Accounts are meant to be accessed by and represent a single individual.
- Even if your company meets the notability criteria, you are discouraged from writing about it due to the inherent conflict of interest it presents. You would also have to abide by the mandatory paid editing disclosure policy.
- If an article about this company is ever accepted, at no time will you or anyone else have ownership or exclusive control over its contents. Articles are editable by anyone, and can change substantially over time. Consensus is Wikipedia's fundamental editorial model.
- Editors are expected to behave civilly and engage in calm, rational discussion. Emotional outbursts (like the above lashing out in anger) is disruptive and can lead to sanctions.