User talk:YYWALB
ATP World Tour Record
[edit]--bringing this to your talk page--
Dear Mr. Fyunck, why you purposely deleted all the work I've done in the ATP World Tour Record? — Preceding unsigned comment added by YYWALB (talk • contribs) 01:35, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- I and at least one other, found many items to be very trivial on a page that was already at its limit in size. I discussed this at Talk:ATP_World_Tour_records#getting_unwieldy_in_size. The basic wiki protocol is: be bold in making your edits, but if anyone challenges those edits you need to stop and bring it to the talk page to gain consensus. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:00, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
See the WP:Tutorial and WP:WIZ......
Ariconte (talk) 06:43, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
ATP World Tour records (Oympics)
[edit]--bringing this to your talk page--
Olympic medalist are all record holders because it is not easy to win an olympic medal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YYWALB (talk • contribs) 02:27, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Please note that I removed the table overview of the Olympic winners as this does not constitute a record. Your argument that "Olympic medalist(s) all record holders because it is not easy to win an olympic medal" is simply not valid. Winning a Masters 1000 or Grand Slam tournament is equally difficult to winning an Olympic tournament yet we do not publish a list of these winners in this article. The article already contains the relevant Olympic records (match wins, winning %, appearances).--Wolbo (talk) 20:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- And just as a friendly FYI, if you place a post on someone's Talk page please place it at the bottom of the page and remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes (Wolbo (talk) 20:53, 29 January 2013 (UTC)) (or using the signature icon on the toolbar). This helps to keep the Talk page tidy. Thx. --Wolbo (talk) 20:53, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles for creation/ATP World Tour and Grand Slam Records (Open Era)
[edit]Noticed you initiated this article for creation. It appears to be an almost complete carbon copy of the existing article ATP World Tour records with the only difference being that it contains the tables which you added to the original article and which were subsequently removed. It does not help the quality of Wikipedia to create a largely duplicate article simply because of an editing disagreement on an existing article. And it is a waste of reviewers time as such an article will quickly be nominated for deletion. It would therefore be best if you retract this article. The proper course of action is to discuss matters on the article's talk page. --Wolbo (talk) 21:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Some advise
[edit]Several things I'm noticing that can be easily corrected. Only use flag icons for player nationality...never for tournaments or cities. make sure scores are in the proper format: 6–7(5–7), 7–6(8–6), 6–4... not 6–7(5), 7–6(6), 6–4. Those are tedious to correct. When you check the history of a page notice it's size... something like (66,656 bytes). We are supposed to keep article at about 60,000 bytes with 100,000 bytes maximum. Wikipedia is about summerizing so if you add to a page that makes it larger than 100k you need to eliminate something to get it back below 100k. The Roger Federer page is already over budget and needs to be chopped so you adding more is not helping at all. Wikipedia is not a collection of stats and it's against policy! see Excessive stats problems. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Excessive tables at Big Four (tennis)
[edit]Hello, You need to consider whether the various tables that you're adding to tennis articles on Wikipedia are needed. We need to have a mixture of prose and tables: people prefer reading different formats. I think that your additions at Big Four (tennis) go a bit too far down the route of just piling up statistics. --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 15:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
You also need to start considering if you want to join us here at wikipedia as a fellow editor or get blocked for not listening, and not be able to edit at all. We have tried to talk to you here, in our summaries, and at Talk:Big Four (tennis). You only started editing here 9 days ago so I haven't called in an administrator for you ignoring what is being told to you. Your reverts and trivial additions to articles such as Big Four (tennis) must stop. You also have to make sure you edit under YYWALB and not an anon IP if possible per wiki policy. Please try to stay within the tennis and wiki guidelines here and talk to us or get a mentor before reverting. I'm going to start treating it as vandalism soon with warnings and user reports. If someone doesn't like a new addition of yours bring it to talk, don't re-revert them. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Lee Chong Wei
[edit]Your recent editing has been removed. The article is about 100KB after your addition and somehow this is exceeding the Wikipedia guidelines. Please refer to elsewhere how to put the content. Another is records shall be well reference, and you not. --Aleenf1 08:39, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lee Chong Wei Career Statistics.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! GAtechnical (talk) 23:31, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Koo Kien Keat & Tan Boon Heong career statistics.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! GAtechnical (talk) 17:40, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ATP World Tour and Grand Slam Records (Open Era).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! GAtechnical (talk) 09:17, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Nadal Losing a set
[edit]Hi Nadal did lose a set in both the 2007 and 2010 French Open tournaments see here (2010) is not disputed. The Men's singles Main article: 2007 French Open – Men's Singles,Spain Rafael Nadal def. Switzerland Roger Federer, 6–3, 4–6, 6–3, 6–4 t was Nadal's 3rd career Grand Slam title, and his 3rd (consecutive) French Open title. Another editor was also putting in the 2012 tournament to make it appear that Nadal had reached 5 Grand Slam finals without losing a set when in fact he has reached 3 GS finals wthout losing a set. Results here Seniors, Men's singles,Main article: 2012 French Open – Men's Singles,Spain Rafael Nadal def. Serbia Novak Djokovic 6–4, 6–3, 2–6, 7–5 if you have dropped a set in the final you have not won it without losing a set.--Navops47 (talk) 16:23, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
- I see where I have been going wrong think he won five without losing a set apologies for that--Navops47 (talk) 16:28, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Koo Kien Keat & Tan Boon Heong career statistics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ATP World Tour and Grand Slam Records (Open Era), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Koo Kien Keat & Tan Boon Heong career statistics
[edit]
Hello YYWALB. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Koo Kien Keat & Tan Boon Heong career statistics".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Koo Kien Keat & Tan Boon Heong career statistics}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)