User talk:YannickFran

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

June 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Codename Lisa. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Internet Explorer 10, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 17:36, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, my friend. Thanks for the reply. I am looking at your image right now and the version number does not read 10.0.1. It reads 10.0.9200. 9200 is bigger than 1. And what about the date? Can you point me to a place where I can download this 10.0.1 and see its release date?
By the way, what is "maart"?
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 22:12, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
10.0.1 is the name of IE version 10.0.9200.16466, the original versionnumber was 10.0.9200.16384 (IE10 RTM), it's where the table is ment for: to display all released versions of IE10. Microsoft just uses an easier name for their updates then the full versionnumber... For example, here is the bolgpost about Internet Explorer 9.0.11: --YannickFran (talk) 20:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Yes, I later realized. Thanks. However, our WP:NOTCHANGELOG policy says articles should not list just every version release unless when they are subject of a critical commentary. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 01:27, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
In that case: did I miss something? Firefox#Release history, Google Chrome#Release history, PlayStation Portable system software, PlayStation 3 software, PlayStation Vita system software, etc. I'm sorry, but Wikipedia is full of those thing, and it seems no one cares and keeps updating them, rather than removing them, beside, that's what's discriped in WP:NOTCHANGELOG. All changelogs I mentioned contains stuff that's completely irrelevant, or even mentions that there are "unknown changes". But what I did, just completing a list there already was, is against the rules? It's not even a changelog on that page, it's just a table that contains release dates of updates for IE. A changelog also metions what's changed (that why it's called a "changelog"). No, seriously?--YannickFran (talk) 14:24, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Internet Explorer 11[edit]


I'll keep it short. Edit warring is bad for a lot of reasons, but one that especially might appeal to you is that it is never successful. You can take the issue to the article talk page or at least try to listen to objection raised in the reverter's edit summary and adjust your subsequent edit respectively.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 13:19, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Microsoft Lumia -> Windows Phone 8 GDR2 Vs. Windows Phone 8 Update 2[edit]

Hello I've seen that you renamed it to "Update 2" because it has officially been renamed retroactively, retroactive renaming doesn't work in articles as changelogs should be written from a contemporary perspective, for example here on Wikipedia Windows Phone 6 and Windows Phone 5 (which both have been retroactively rebranded to Windows Phone) are still called Windows Mobile 5 and Windows Mobile 6 on Wikipedia because the retroactive rebranding wasn't used until after the Windows Phone 7 Series were released, another example would be how I wrote "Nokia Camera" in Lumia Cyan and "Lumia Camera" in Lumia Denim. Also I searched and Lumia Amber itself was a codename so you did in fact add all the firmware codenames. Sincerely, --Namlong618 (talk) 19:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but Windows Mobile 5 and Windows Mobile 6 have never been rebranded to Windows Phone 5 and Windows Phone 6. Neither was Nokia Camera retroactively rebranded, it got a new brand with an update and was part of Lumia Denim already. As GDR2 is a codename, "Update 2" is the official name of the update.--YannickFran (talk) 19:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Nope, Windows Phone 5 and 6 were used on the Microsoft Community as "Windows Phone 6.5 and earlier" as you can see here, GDR wasn't a codename it was official GDR3 was the only one that was officially unveiled as "Update 3" in fact the Windows Phone 8 page mentions this, and I never stated that the Nokia Camera was "retroactively" rebranded, that was Windows Mobile, the Nokia Camera was simply rebranded (which is also metioned in the Wikitable), but I stated that the template should use contemporary names, otherwise we should be re-writing every Windows Mobile page as well. Sincerely, --Namlong618 (talk) 20:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Apparently the article changed it, but still contemporary evidence suggests that Update 3 was the first not to be officially refered to as "GDR" as you can read here, but that's the only thing I wanted to make clear concerning the naming I'll discuss it with others on the WP8 article as well, anyhow cheers. --Namlong618 (talk) 20:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of ModernBB for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ModernBB is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ModernBB until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:03, 2 April 2015 (UTC)