User talk:Yarbo's Tooth
July 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Deaths in 2010, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. . — CIS (talk | stalk) 16:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Blocked as a sock puppet
[edit]You may contest this block by adding the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.Yarbo's Tooth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I didn't do anything to damage the page. I added useful information. You just so uptight and insecure
Decline reason:
I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 19:52, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Yarbo's Tooth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The original reason of the previous blockings were reckless deletion of information from the DEATHS IN 2010 section. I ADDED a new section. What i fail to see is the part of being a sockpuppet. The blocker's head is full of hot air and believes every edit is damaging
Decline reason:
Personal attacks are not the best way to get your request for unblocking reviewed on the merits. Quite the opposite, I think this request clarifies precisely why the block should stand. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 20:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Yarbo's Tooth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
But that doesn't mean as Yarbo's Tooth that i damaged the page in any way. This is unfair treatment. I added useful information, i didn't delete anything.
Decline reason:
This request does not address the reason for your block, which is the inappropriate use of multiple accounts. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:55, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.