User talk:Yonil EVO

The owner of this account is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

Unfortunately, there have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yonil EVO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Yoni Lerne (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I wasn't aware of this policy, I felt like I was adding value to Wikipedia by adding Figures and updating topics. Now that I understand the system better I'll be happy to continue sharing my knowledge and time to Wikipedia and adding useful contributions from various sources. I would appreciate if you can re-post all my changes done so far, I think all my changes so far were a great add-on. Thank you.

Decline reason:

There is no reason to unblock you if your only intention is to spam links to your own website. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:33, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For the unblocking admin, note that the contributions from this user were in violation of WP:COI and it is concerning that the user is asking these be reposted. It appears the user does not understand how inappropriate these changes were. --Yamla (talk) 12:21, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yonil EVO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Yoni Lerne (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

My intention was to add more value to Wikipedia not to spam, and as I said I'll be happy to continue doing that, using different and various websites

Decline reason:

Your stated intention to continue referring to various websites is worrying. Please tell us your understanding of what "spam" is.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:49, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yonil EVO (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for your response Anthony Bradbury, I understood that the problem of Wikipedia with my actions was that I added a few topics with not a lot of text mostly from the same website source. Now when I understand the problem with my actions, and would like to continue adding value to Wikipedia, this time from various sources and add more text descriptions

Decline reason:

You have not agreed to stop adding links to your website. If I see any other account add links to evolita, I will add that site to our spam blacklist. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yonil, this is not the only concern, or even the primary concern, with your edits. --Yamla (talk) 12:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]