User talk:YoungPicasso777

Welcome!

Hi YoungPicasso777! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Rajeev Gaur123 (talk) 17:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:14, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm here to help create Wikipedia's. I've helped plenty of pages. Including Hakha, liberty university, etc Why am I being blocked?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YoungPicasso777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here YoungPicasso777 (talk) 18:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:26, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edits like this look like you are being deliberately malicious, trying to increase your edit count. Explain? --Yamla (talk) 18:27, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's confusing why I'm being blocked. Are my edits on my talk page being counted against me? If so can someone infor me how I'm being disruptive on my own wikipefia talk page? I've haven't made any disruptives edits on others wikipedia pages. Just grammar edits and added references. If I was being disruptive in any way on others wikipefia pages can you show me. I would like to know too. I want to make improvements on wikipedia. Especially for Myanmars wikipedia content and technology stubs. Sorry for the inconvience I'm rather shocked I'm getting blocked :(

Those edits were certainly disruptive. What on earth did you think you were doing with them? --Yamla (talk) 18:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=Your reason here YoungPicasso777 (talk) 18:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC)}[reply]

I have removed this unblock request. You need to explain why you believe the block should be lifted, if making an unblock request. WP:GAB goes in to much more detail. --Yamla (talk) 18:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla I was unaware that edits to my own page caused a disruption. I realize my mistake of making too many edits on my talk page to increase my edits is very unapproved by wikipedia I will not do it again, and will be productive. Please have mercy. I only have one device if I'm blocked on here my wikipedia days are over. My mistake was based off my ignorance of the wikipedia rules and policy. I will do my best yo review those rules and any other tips and suggeztions you have to give. YoungPicasso777 (talk) 18:41, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Could you explain why you were performing those edits to your userpage in the first place? 2601:1C0:B:4885:9484:FB9E:1E5C:6851 (talk) 18:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It should also be noted that if you continue to abuse your TPA by making empty unblock requests, then you will lose access to this page. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 18:55, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I simply wanted more edits. Yes, it was vain of me and I'm very sorry for the trouble I'm causing all of you :( YoungPicasso777 (talk) 18:57, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of giving me a life ban (blocking( could either of you give me resources that I can study to become a productive contributor and editor.YoungPicasso777 (talk) 18:59, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But why did you want more edits? 2601:1C0:B:4885:9484:FB9E:1E5C:6851 (talk) 19:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see users with thousands of edits and I only had around 150 so I wanted to be like other editors. Sounds silly and makes me sound like a loser but I honestly didn't think I would get blocked bc of that . I didn't do it out of a mean spirit but I did it for selfish gain and pride. I'm sorry YoungPicasso777 (talk) 19:09, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to contribute constructively, go to Help:Introduction and learn. Also, please don't get editcountitis; it's not good for anybody. And if you want to get unblocked, try a valid reason or an admin will most likely revoke your talkpage access. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 20:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YoungPicasso777 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand completely what I did was wrong. I understand now that a user cannot create edits on their talk page with the motive to get a higher edit count. I offer my sincere apologizes and promise to be productive on Wikipedia and no longer be an annoyance. YoungPicasso777 (talk) 04:35, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppet accounts:

Anthonytownley333 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Saguiar50 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Myanmar4ever (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Thoroughbredwinner (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.