User talk:Zach C
Image copyright problem with Image:Jesuscamp.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Jesuscamp.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:36, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Comments for Zach
[edit]Hi Zach - I know Heidi and Rachel and have seen the film. I'm glad to see this entry about it.
a question on this paragraph:
During the 2004 Presidential election John Edwards's "Two Americas" speech seemed like a rather unoriginal way to describe the growing divide in this country. But now, after having spent almost a year shuttling back and forth between the religious heartland of Missouri, and home in New York City, the "two Americas" concept has taken on an entirely new meaning. Clearly there are two parallel Americas: and one is a conservative counterculture comprised of tens of millions of Evangelical Christians who feel engaged in a culture war with what they perceive as immorality and godless liberalism. They consume their own news and popular culture via Christian television, radio, and publications, and carefully expose their children both to a literal interpretation of the bible and a call to political activism.
The part:
"But now, after having spent almost a year shuttling back and forth between the religious heartland of Missouri, and home in New York City, the "two Americas" concept has taken on an entirely new meaning. "
is unclear to me. It does not state who is shuttling back and forth and why that is important or for whom the concept has taken on a new meaning. It seems to reflect an opinion of Heidi or Rachel's(?), but is not really descriptive of the film itself.
I didn't want to try to edit this myself but thought I should highlight my impression of it to you for your consideration.
Separately, I think there could be an open issue with Wikipedia regarding an image that didn't go through the right process to show wikipedia that the image is used with proper permission. I think it's pretty easy to upload the image and just write out that the image is owned by whomever but is valid to be used here as it's just a reproduction of an image that was used to promote and was released to newspapers, etc. these links may help
Fair Use: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fair_use#Images Publicity Photos: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Publicity_photos
kd
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Jesus Camp, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.jesuscampthemovie.com/ (turn off javascript or view source to view the text), and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Jesus Camp. Then you should do one of the following:
- Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Jesus Camp where we can find that note; or
- Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL.
It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Interiot 14:21, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
The file File:BWCrossJC.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 May 2019 (UTC)