User talk:Zanramon

License tagging for Image:Riomavuba.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Riomavuba.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:08, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Juliocruxz.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Juliocruxz.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted

The images you are uploaded are copyrighted. Please cease immediatley. Thank you. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:LouisSaha.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LouisSaha.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:10, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LouisSaha.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LouisSaha.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:22, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lyonteam.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lyonteam.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:33, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alexf

Please do not write on other people's pages. That is considered vandalism. You should use the Talk page instead (like we are doing here). You wrote in Portuguese for some reason, so I'll repeat the message in it here, in case your English is not good enough. -- Alexf^{(Talk/Contribs)} 18:14, 24 December 2007 (UTC) Favor não escrever nas páginas de outras pessoas. Isso é considerado vandalismo. Vc deve usar as páginas de "Talk" (como estamos fazendo aqui nesta). Vc escreveu em portugês por alguma razão, assi que eu escrevo também a você (mais lembra que esto é a Wikipedia em inglés). -- Alexf^{(Talk/Contribs)} 18:14, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Berbatov1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Berbatov1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Zanrmon (halo)

A tag has been placed on Zanrmon (halo) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Truthanado (talk) 22:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Danny Welbeck, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Danny Welbeck is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Danny Welbeck saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Printer222 (talk) 15:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks

Please immediately stop and explain your edits to User:Camilo Sanchez. Thanks. – Luna Santin (talk) 08:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked this account from editing indefinitely. – Luna Santin (talk) 08:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]