Jump to content

User talk:Zoramid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
A plate of chocolate chip cookies.
Welcome!

Hello, Zoramid, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 19:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Zoramid, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 19:32, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Liz How to upload a Movie poster on Wikipedia Common. Can you Guide me ? Zoramid (talk) 19:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poppay Ki Wedding moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Poppay Ki Wedding. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 20:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poppay Ki Wedding moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Poppay Ki Wedding. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it fails to meet WP:GNG. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 20:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib As i Move this article to the main space now, how it can meet the notability. Wait 24 Hours and the then check the Page views that this article is meeting notability or not ? Zoramid (talk) 20:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you to please refrain from moving the draft to the main namespace. It's better to work on it first and then submit it for review. Continuously moving it might be viewed as disruptive editing.Saqib (talk I contribs) 20:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Akhara (series) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Akhara (series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Sources are not reliable. Majority are under NEWSORGINDIA. Sending back to draft as WP:ATD.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 06:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 There are more than 10 references and these references are Reliable. I think it don't need to move in Draft space from main space. Zoramid (talk) 07:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I do not see that it meets notability. Quantity does not make something notable. We are not here to promote Green Entertainment. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're putting up pages for those not-so-famous Pakistani TV shows. Just a suggestion. Maybe try making drafts first and then submitting them for review. It's better than straight-up creating them in the main namespace. And please watch out for those unreliable sources!Saqib (talk I contribs) 20:04, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poppay Ki Wedding (May 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Saqib was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Saqib (talk I contribs) 06:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gentleman (TV series) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Gentleman (TV series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jaan Nisar moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Jaan Nisar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jaan Nisar moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Jaan Nisar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gentleman (TV series) moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Gentleman (TV series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 09:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft

[edit]

Hello - I suggest you again to please refrain from moving the draft to the main namespace. It's better to work on it first and then submit it for review. Continuously moving it might be viewed as disruptive editing.Saqib (talk I contribs) 10:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib I Know you will declined the Review of Draft article. You are doing an Crackdown against Pakistani media related articles. I think you got a task or on a mission to remove all Pakistani television or media related articles. Zoramid (talk) 11:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not the only reviewer.Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Saqib In Draft:Gentleman (TV series) i provided more than 20 references. But a Page that you created like Naima Kanwal is with only 3 references. Why are you not looking at own articles ? Zoramid (talk) 11:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You comparing apples with oranges. You provided 20+ references but majority of them are unreliable while the rest are not enough to satisfy GNG.Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Saqib I'm informing you about your own created articles Zoramid (talk) 12:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 12:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zoramid (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why I'm blocked. I didn't make any disruptive edit. I made contributions with reliable sources or Refrences. In Draft:Gentleman (TV series) i provided more than 20 references, But User:Saqib moved the page from Main space to Draft space because User:Saqib is on a mission to remove all Pakistani media related articles. You can confirm by looking on his contributions. Also looking on Pages that created by User:Saqib are with just 2 to 3 references, like Naima Kanwal and Afshan Hassan is with only 3 references.

My editing behavior is also neat and Clean and the sources i provide are Reliable. Also my account put under the investigation page of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nauman335. I'm not a sock user and the Checkuser can also clear that. Please unblock me and i request to take a strict look on User:Saqib contributions that what is he doing. He also edits Pakistani media related articles, so he is a sock user ? Please unblock me I'm making request and clarify my case. Also i provided evidence against User: Saqib. Thanks Zoramid (talk) 13:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zoramid (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why I'm blocked. I didn't make any disruptive edit. I made contributions with reliable sources or Refrences. In Draft:Gentleman (TV series) i provided more than 20 references, But User:Saqib moved the page from Main space to Draft space because User:Saqib is on a mission to remove all Pakistani media related articles. You can confirm by looking on his contributions. Also looking on Pages that created by User:Saqib are with just 2 to 3 references, like Naima Kanwal and Afshan Hassan is with only 3 references.

My editing behavior is also neat and Clean and the sources i provide are Reliable. Also my account put under the investigation page of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nauman335. I'm not a sock user and the Checkuser can also clear that. Please unblock me and i request to take a strict look on User:Saqib contributions that what is he doing. He also edits Pakistani media related articles, so he is a sock user ? Please unblock me I'm making request and clarify my case. Also i provided evidence against User: Saqib. Thanks Zoramid (talk) 16:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry, as above. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.