Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carbonyl Gas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tim Vickers (talk) 21:58, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carbonyl Gas[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, and a quick Google search doesn't appear to indicate that "Carbonyl gas" is a real thing. The article creator agreed on their talk page that the content is probably unverifiable at this time. VQuakr (talk) 07:32, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it is misleading. Carbonyl gas would be carbon monoxide or could be nickel carbonyl, but not with a capital G. Perhaps one producer uses the term as jargon for their output, but sources have to be supplied before we keep the writings. The "Store-Karaev process" is also made up. ru:Carbonyl Gas has also been recently speedy deleted for not being in Russian. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:00, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, there is another Russian article on the topic: ru:Карбонильный газ. ChemNerd (talk) 14:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:47, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:48, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Zero sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:01, 20 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 13:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. shoy (reactions) 13:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The content is simply too vague to even determine what carbonyl gas is. I suspect it is just a trade name for one company's product that is a specific mixture of fossil fuels. ChemNerd (talk) 14:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Fake until proven otherwise. South Nashua (talk) 12:33, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.