Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Management innovation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:48, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Management innovation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original research cobbled together from various sources, much of it now deleted because of copyright. The article fails even to provide references supporting its title as a notable, rather than generic, term. Lithopsian (talk) 20:07, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:01, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:02, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TNT. The lead alone is a total mess, and much of this must be re-written from scratch. Bearian (talk) 01:44, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SophisticatedSwampert ^{let's talk about that} 04:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- reads like a personal essay or project. Not something one would expect to find in an encyclopedia. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:00, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete reads like an essay, delete per WP:TNT. Possible (weak) WP:NOTWEBHOST. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 07:08, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.