Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malaysia Airlines Flight 128

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:03, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Malaysia Airlines Flight 128[edit]

Malaysia Airlines Flight 128 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:37, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:37, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:37, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:37, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Insignificant flight that is nowhere near notable enough for its own article. Ajf773 (talk) 10:41, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Snow Delete Nothing about the article is worth keeping. Sario528 (talk) 12:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete : WP:NOTNEWS per nom. Coderzombie (talk) 17:47, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, if we had an article for every time someone made any kind of threat on a plane, we'd have to start disambiguating titles. Also per everything above. Gatemansgc (talk) 18:36, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment (creator) This has received significant coverage in sources, [1] [2] , it may set a precedent I am currently expanding on it. Regards. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 22:20, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Unless this incident leads to a change airline laws/regulations, I don't see this article ever meeting Wikipedia inclusion criteria. Sario528 (talk) 12:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The guy probably didn't even know he was on an aircraft. Mental healt project might be interested but Aviation is not!--Petebutt (talk) 14:57, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:NOTNEWS and WP:EVENT definitely apply here as it isn't that notable and since the guy had mental health issues he probably wasn't fully aware of his surroundings and not a proper threat to the flight. Just like the United Airlines flight where the doctor was dragged off, this article was created off news reports without any proper basis or research done into it. Flashjacket348 (talk) 21:25, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not notable, it happens regularly. Wykx (talk) 07:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Insufficient evidence of notability. --Guy Macon (talk) 08:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete If the passenger got into the cockpit, that might be notable enough. Otherwise, this just sounds like an average day of the week for that SWAT team. South Nashua (talk) 13:39, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Non-notable bomb threat. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 12:30, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - unlike the United Airlines doctor-drag-off incident, coverage of this event has died down, even here in Australia. It was news; almost anything these days is news, but a brief flurry of news reports should not be confused with notability. YSSYguy (talk) 22:49, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.