Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patsy (Monty Python) (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Patsy (Monty Python)[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A minor character in Monty Python and the Holy Grail. A search yielded very few additional results, and the current article is so small that I don't see a need for it to exist separately from other Monty Python articles. All notable reception can be covered by Spamlot's article, if it isn't already. Pokelego999 (talk) 23:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Film, and Theatre. Pokelego999 (talk) 23:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This fictional character is not notable. All encyclopedic information about him should be given in the film and musical articles to the extent appropriate per WP:DUE. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Not seeing how the article even tries to estabilish notability, and my BEFORE just gave few mentions in passing. Ping me if SIGCOV coverage that goes beyond plot summary is found. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a minor character in Monty Python and the Holy Grail, barely more important than Sir Not-appearing-in-this-film. Why should he have an article when there isn't (and shouldn't be) even a King Arthur (Monty Python)? Clarityfiend (talk) 12:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Such a minor character fails GNG; should be deleted without any doubt! Ekdalian (talk) 13:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass the standard for WP:SIGCOV. Shooterwalker (talk) 14:19, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subject fails GNG. Bobherry Talk My Edits 01:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.