Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrators: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 71.192.89.95 (talk) to last version by The Halo
→‎Other: add short paragraph detailing the exact history of "adminship is no big deal" with sources
Line 111: Line 111:
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct#Use of administrator privileges|Requests for comment/User conduct: Use of administrator privileges]]
*[[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct#Use of administrator privileges|Requests for comment/User conduct: Use of administrator privileges]]
* [[Wikipedia:Requests for de-adminship]]
* [[Wikipedia:Requests for de-adminship]]

A often paraphrased comment about adminship is the following, said by Jimbo Wales in Feb 2003:
*"becoming a sysop<nowiki>[technical name for adminship]</nowiki> is '''not a big deal'''" [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2003-February/001149.html wikimedia.org archive entry]; [http://article.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.english/1125/match=not%20a%20big%20deal gmane archive entry].


== Dealing with grievances ==
== Dealing with grievances ==

Revision as of 21:44, 15 August 2006

Administrators, or sysops, are Wikipedians who have access to technical features that help with maintenance. Those include protecting and deleting pages, blocking other editors, and undoing these actions as well. Wikipedia's practice is to grant this access to anyone who has been an active and regular Wikipedia contributor for a while, is familiar with and respects Wikipedia policy, and is generally a known and trusted member of the community.

Request assistance - Full list of administrators - Requests for adminship

In the early days of Wikipedia all users acted as administrators and in principle they still should. Any user can behave as if they are an administrator (provided they do not falsely claim to be one), even if they have not been given the extra administrative functions. Users doing so are more likely to be nominated as full administrators by members of the community and more likely to be chosen when they are finally nominated. From early on, it has been pointed out that administrators should never develop into a special subgroup of the community, but should be a part of the community like anyone else only equipped with a few more tools to do some chores that would potentially be harmful if everyone were entrusted with them. In practice, standards to getting appointed administrator have risen but there are still several administrators created every week.

The community does look to administrators to perform essential housekeeping chores that require the extra access administrators are entrusted with. Among them are watching the Articles for deletion debates and carrying out the consensus of the community on keeping or deleting these articles, keeping an eye on new and changed articles to swiftly delete obvious vandalism, and meeting user requests for help that require administrative access. Since administrators are expected to be experienced members of the community, users seeking help will often turn to an administrator for advice and information. In general, administrators acting in this role are neutral. They do not have any direct involvement in the issues they are helping people with.

So, what's the deal?

The wiki software has a few important features that are restricted. Of those restricted features, administrators have access to the following. (New admins, see Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide.)

Protected pages

Deletion and undeletion

  • Delete pages, including images, and their history. For information and guidelines, see both Wikipedia:Deletion policy and (most definitely) Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators. To suggest a page for deletion (after reading the policy and guidelines pages!), see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Sometimes deletion is a technical matter, in which a redirection page has to be removed to make way for renaming an article, or a page whose history has been broken up has to be deleted and the pieces recombined. Other times it's a matter of cleaning up simple junk edits on pages with no actual content, or removing material that has been pasted in from another site and infringes copyright.

Block and unblock

  • Block IP addresses, IP ranges, and user accounts, for a specific time or indefinitely.
  • Unblock IP addresses, IP ranges, and user accounts.

Reverting

  • Revert pages quickly. Any user (logged-in or not) can revert a page to an earlier version. Administrators have a faster, automated reversion tool to help them revert vandalism by anonymous editors. When looking at a user's contributions, a link that looks like: [rollback] – appears next to edits that are at the top of the edit history. Clicking on the link reverts to the last edit not authored by that user, with an edit summary of (Reverted edits by X to last version by Y) and marks it as a minor change.
  • Do not use one-click rollback on edits that are not simple vandalism; please use manual rollback with an appropriate edit summary.

Enforcement of Arbitration Committee rulings

Admins have the authority to enforce rulings by the Arbitration Committee.

Keeping vandalism out of recent changes

  • Admins can exclude bulk vandalism from Recent changes. To do this, add &bot=1 to the end of the URL used to access a user's contributions. For example, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Example&bot=1. When the rollback links on the contributions list are clicked, the revert and the original edit that you are reverting will both be hidden from the default recent changes display. (The bot marker was originally added to keep massive bot edits from flooding recent changes, hence the "bot".) This means that they will be hidden from recent changes unless you click the "bots" link to set hidebots=0. The edits are not hidden from contributions lists, page histories or watchlists. The edits remain in the database and are not removed, but they no longer flood recent changes. The aim of this feature is to reduce the annoyance factor of a flood vandal with relatively little effort. This should not be used for reverting a change you just don't like, but is meant only for simple vandalism, particularly massive flood vandalism.

Design and wording of the interface

  • Admins can change the text of the interface by editing the pages in the MediaWiki namespace. This includes the text at the top of pages such as the "Special:Whatlinkshere" and the page that a blocked user will see when they try to edit a page (MediaWiki:Blockedtext).

Other

There are various other actions which only those with administrator privileges can perform:

Becoming an administrator

If you have been around for a while and you would like sysop access, add your name to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship according to the guidelines mentioned there, and a discussion will take place by fellow editors in order to determine if there is consensus that you should become an administrator.

It is recommended that you write for Wikipedia for a while before requesting administrator status, since other users will have to recognize you before they can agree on your promotion. Also keep in mind that each language's Wikipedia has its own policies for administrators, which may differ somewhat.

Although multiple user accounts are allowed on Wikipedia in certain circumstances, only one should have admin powers beyond being an editor.

Be careful, please! If you are granted access, we ask that you exercise care in using these functions, especially the ability to delete pages and their history, to delete images, and the ability to block IP addresses. You can learn about your newfound powers at the Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide. You should also take a look at the pages linked from the Administrators' reading list before using any of your admin abilities.

Places where admins in particular can assist

Admin rights can be particularly helpful for working in certain areas of Wikipedia.

Other access types

In addition to administrators, there are other types of identified users, listed here in roughly ascending order of power. Administrators lie between bots and bureaucrats on this list. See also Wikipedia:User access levels.

IP addresses

Visitors who haven't "signed in" can still do most things, including the most important: editing articles and helping with Wikipedia maintenance tasks.

Signed-in users

Signed-up users can do everything IP addresses can do. They can also upload files, start new articles and, once they reach the "autoconfirm" threshold, they can move/rename pages and edit semi-protected pages. See Special:Userlogin to sign up.

Bots

The edits of users with bot status turned on do not show up in recent changes, usually only used for mass edits by bots.

Bureaucrats

Users with "bureaucrat" status can turn other users into sysops (but not remove sysop status), change usernames, and flag and unflag bots accounts. Bureaucrats are created by other bureaucrats on projects where these exist, or by stewards on those who don't yet have one. Sysoppings are recorded in Special:Log/rights or Wikipedia:Bureaucrat log for activity prior to December 24, 2004. Sysoppings by stewards are recorded at Meta:Special:Log/rights but the few stewards who actively sysop users on the English Wikipedia do so using their local bureaucrat status, making this distinction rather academic.

Stewards

Users with "Steward" status can change the access of any user on any Wikimedia project. This includes granting and revoking sysop access and marking users as bots. Their actions are recorded at Special:Log/rights on meta. Requests for their assistance can be made at m:Requests for permissions. Normally, they will not perform actions that can be carried out by a local bureaucrat.

Checkusers

Users with the "Checkuser" permission can retrieve the IP addresses used by a username and can also retrieve all edits by users using a certain IP or IP range. A log of Checkuser actions is visable to all Checkusers.

Oversights

Users with the "Oversight" permission can hide revisions of pages from all users. These revisions can temporarily be accessed and reviewed by users with the oversight permission. A log of oversight actions is visible to all Oversights.

Developers

The highest degree of technical access (actually a group of levels, the difference between all but the lowest of which isn't really visible to users) is "developer", for those who can make direct changes to the MediaWiki software and the Wikimedia wiki farm and databases. These people, by and large, do not carry out administrative functions, aside from sock puppet checks and reattributing edits.

They can be contacted via the wikitech-l mailing list. See m:Developers for a list of developers and further information.

Administrator abuse

Administrators can be removed if they misuse their powers. Currently, administrators may be removed either at the request of Jimbo Wales or by a ruling of the Arbitration Committee. At their discretion, lesser penalties may also be assessed against problematic administrators, including the restriction of their use of certain powers or placement on administrative probation. The technical ability to remove administrator status rests with stewards.

Other

The amount of begging to be made an administrator is usually directly related to how long it will take to become one. Instead of asking first, do what you can for the encyclopedia and show your worth.

See also:

A often paraphrased comment about adminship is the following, said by Jimbo Wales in Feb 2003:

Dealing with grievances

If you think an administrator has acted improperly against you or another editor, you should express your concerns directly to the administrator responsible. Try to come to a resolution in an orderly and civil manner. However, if the matter is not resolved between the two parties, you can take further action according to Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. There have been a number of alternative procedures suggested for the removal of sysop status but none of them have achieved consensus.