Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BattyBot 37

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

BattyBot 37

Operator: GoingBatty (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 02:07, Friday December 19, 2014 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): AutoWikiBrowser

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: Categorize articles with video clips

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 62#Categorize articles with video clips

Edit period(s): One time run for now, may run again if needed

Estimated number of pages affected: 5,675

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No):

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: There are currently 6,297 articles with video clips; see list here (put in 7000 as the limit to see them all). This bot would add them all to Category:Articles containing video clips, except for the 622 articles that already have the category. The bot would also perform and general fixes if the category is added. GoingBatty (talk) 02:07, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

{{BotTrial}} Speedy Trial Approval---please post back your trial results. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:11, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{BotTrialComplete}} - see these diffs. GoingBatty (talk) 02:49, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The trial looked fine, however as a non-BAG action I think there is a problem with this premise and have brought this up at CFD. Should the result be a keep, task approval should be no issue.

{{onhold}} (Category:Articles containing video clips) has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:06, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note, still pending closure of that CfD, seems to be going long. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:07, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 December 19 is on {{adminbacklog}} still. — xaosflux ^Talk 18:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Phoebe and Xaosflux: The CfD was closed with no consensus. What now? GoingBatty (talk) 02:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No-consensus is a default keep, so the hold on this is released. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. Following the one-time run, please allow at least 10 days for anyone to bring up new concerns before subsequent runs. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 02:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.