Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bad Religion/archive1

Bad Religion[edit]

This just seems like a very comprehensive article about a hugely influential band86.132.211.71 14:41, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, someone just nominated this, but I think that the intro paragraph is going to need some work (right now it's just two sentences), as well as the addition of any additional references if we can find 'em. For the intro PP, perhaps some mention could be made of the lyrical content (both with regards to meaning as well as to the vocabulary)... If I can think of a good way to phrase it myself, I'll post something. m13b 13:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe there could be something in there about their trademark 'oozin aahs'

Strong Oppose lead is too short and is completely devoid of references. The Filmaker 14:57, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose ditto Rlevse 16:22, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Short lead, very listy, no inline citations. Sandy 17:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to Peer Review, this just needs too much work to be on FAC. Suggest delisting. — mark ✎ 19:25, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To that I agree. Putting up for peer review instead. Feel free to delist, unsure how myself. m13b 17:00, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]