Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Casimir Pulaski/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 10:02, 16 October 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Casimir Pulaski[edit]

Featured article candidates/Casimir Pulaski/archive1

Nominator(s): _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:54, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A-class article, comprehensive, after several rounds of copyediting. Let's hear some comments. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:54, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This is a WikiCup nomination. The following nominators are WikiCup participants: Piotrus. To the nominator: if you do not intend to submit this article at the WikiCup, feel free to remove this notice. UcuchaBot (talk) 00:01, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural note -- Per FAC instructions, a nominator shouldn't be putting up any article for FAC for two weeks after they've had a nom archived without seeking leave to do so; did I miss one of my colleagues agreeing to this one? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:54, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I keep forgetting how bureaucraticized FACs are those days. No, I don't even know who your colleagues are, or where to ask, I'd have thought this nom would not need bureaucratic justification (one article is done, I have time to look over FA-level concerns over the other). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:18, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FAC has no more rules these days than it's had for the past few years, since before Graham Colm and I joined Ucucha as delegates over 18 months ago. Incidentally, you can find all our names in the instructions at the top of WP:FAC as always, along with the rule about requiring leave for any nominations less than two weeks after an article's been archived. Nothing new there, and it's the same for everyone unless an exception's justified -- I'm not sure that there is in this case, but Graham as the closing delegate for your previous nom may feel differently. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived because it does not comply with the FAC instructions, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Graham Colm (talk) 20:08, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.