Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Claudius/archive1
I would like to self-nominate the article on the Emperor Claudius. I have completely overhauled this article over the course of the last day. The previous article was lacking in detail and heavily criticized on its discussion page. The new article encompasses a variety of new and old sources on the subject, which are listed in the new bibliography.
- Nomination by User:LaurenCole. No vote. PacknCanes | say something! 03:52, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. I quote from above: "I have completely overhauled this article over the course of the last day." I'd like to see the page given a while to seetle as the editors who have been discussing it on the talk page get a chance to review the new changes. You cannot say this article meets the FA stability requirement if it has been rewritten in the last 24 hours. Harro5 04:40, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Refer to Peer Review - well done, but: (i) Some more images would be nice. (ii) Presumably the "Bibliography" are references? (iii) It would also be nice for other editors to have a chance to review. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:40, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - same reasons as Harro5. I like the changes but we shouldn't rush into a featured article. --Ignignot 14:58, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- I understand, I will remove the article from consideration and put it up for peer review. -- LaurenCole