2nd nomination. I think all previous items were addressed, an since failed nomination the article has been reviewed by a member of the League of Copyeditors and sailed through GA review without any comments/changes. Artilce has the breadth and depth of a FA class article and meets the MOS, as well as all other aspects of the FA criteria. Aboutmovies 18:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Support, all concerns from both FACs have been addressed, and between the first and second FAC, article was extensively copyedited by a member of the the League of Copyeditors, who otherwise had no input into the article. (note: I am a significant contributor to this article) Katr67 20:30, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Support. Good feedback has been generated from GA and previous FA nominations, and numerous editors (myself included) have participated in improving the article. This article truly reflects the power of collaborative authorship. One of the finer articles I've encountered. -Pete 22:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Support. I believe the article meets all FA criteria and should be recognized as such. -BigSmooth 00:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Comment Oregon Supreme Court shouldn't be included in the see also section as it is already linked in the article. Epbr123 18:17, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Looks really good for the most part, but a couple minor things...
Does state really need to be capitalized? Per WP:MoS, only pronouns basically need them, and while Oregon most definitely is one and capitol can be, I think state is a regular noun in this usage.
I've been kinda wondering about this. Is "Oregon State Capitol" a proper name? If not, what about these other possible article titles: "Capitol of Oregon", "Oregon Capitol", "Oregon's Capitol" -- ? -Pete 05:53, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
This is just nit-picking, but should the footnotes be two columns? With 30+ notes, it takes a little too much scrolling. If this means the statue image needs shifting, I'd be happy to try it myself. VanTuckyTalk 21:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Comment - As to the name, it matches what the state calls it, and that seems to be the consensus for stat caps as well so I think it should stay as titled. As to two columns, go for it. Aboutmovies 06:12, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Good enough for me, re: title. I have no strong preference on the columns. -Pete 07:51, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.