Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Toledo War

Toledo War[edit]

Self nomination, This article, already a GA, was a failed FAC about two months ago, and since that time, it has undergone a large amount of rewriting and has gone through several cycles of copy-editing. A second peer review was also conducted, with positive feedback. The result, I believe, is a much improved article that meets and exceeds all of the standards presented at WP:WIAFA. I hope this can become a featured article, and I will gladly address any of your comments or concerns. Thank you.

Latest peer review: Peer review
Previous nomination: Archive1

Support, per nom. Hotstreets 00:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
SupportRlevse 00:37, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Footnotes are references, please merge.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 10:27, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I was following WP:CITE, which said that maintaining a separate References section in alphabetical order might help readers. However, since all sources in this article are footnoted, I would have no problem at all with removing it you still wanted me to. Thanks -- Hotstreets 18:49, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course, a fine article. -- Grafikm ^(AutoGRAF) 12:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, well-written and comprehensive Stilgar135 17:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent article.--Alabamaboy 14:04, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very pleased to support this excellent article. MarkBuckles (talk) 06:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Good job. I have no criticisms to mention. Lovelac7 09:22, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]