Wikipedia:Featured article review/Michigan State University/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 2:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC) [1].

Michigan State University

Notified: Lovelac7, WP Higher Education, WikiProject Michigan, diff 2020-11-08

Review section

I am nominating this featured article for review because it fails the sourcing criteria, with sourcing missing and poorly formatted as noticed by DrKay November last year. Also some sandwiching, and examples of outdatedness (f.i. student democracy numbers cited to 2006 source). FemkeMilene (talk) 07:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a serious mess of images crammed in gratuitously, and the alumni section is out of control. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This article is too long to be read comfortably, per WP:SIZE; there is no need for the alumni section to be so long when List of Michigan State University people exists. The promotional claim in the lead that MSU pioneered the studies of packaging, hospitality business, supply chain management, and communication sciences. is not in the body of the article, or sourced. Too many unsourced claims throughout. Total confusion between rankings/years, we have Michigan State ranks 101–150 in the world in 2016, according to the Academic Ranking of World Universities. in the text, then 2020 data in those tables of rankings (which shouldn't be in the article anyway). RetiredDuke (talk) 19:20, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC, massive cleanup needs. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:02, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not an expert in universities, but Delist just for the citation needed tags alone. I've only scrolled through it for like ten seconds. HumanxAnthro (talk) 03:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fyi: we don't say delist/keep in this stage yet: that's for the FARC stage. FemkeMilene (talk) 18:28, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC - heavy issues, lots of cleanup needed. Hog Farm _Talk 17:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section

Issues raised in the review section included sourcing, images, size and datedness. DrKay (talk) 20:05, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delist does not meet verifiability requirements. (t · c) buidhe 20:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - lot of work still outstanding, and nobody's stepping up to work on this one. Hog Farm _Talk 03:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delist a lot more work needs to be done to bring it to FA standards, and no one has volunteered. Z1720 (talk) 22:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.