Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Ricardo Arjona discography/archive2
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 18:05, 25 September 2012 [1].
Ricardo Arjona discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/Ricardo Arjona discography/archive1
- Featured list candidates/Ricardo Arjona discography/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): — ΛΧΣ21™ 20:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because the minor sources issues that prevented the list to reach FL status have been adressed and i think it could be promoted this time. Thanks. — ΛΧΣ21™ 20:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Now that the minor issues that caused the article to not be promoted the first time around have been addressed, I see no reason to not promote this article. Zac 21:07, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from TBrandley (talk) 21:45, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
TBrandley 21:23, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support looks peachy. TBrandley 21:45, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks again for your comments :) They're very welcome. Regards. — ΛΧΣ21™ 21:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per last FLC. Erick (talk) 06:09, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 07:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Quick oppose lots of quick support, perhaps not many of them have looked in detail....
The Rambling Man (talk) 18:29, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support. I looked through the list and I really think it deserves the bronze star. Good job ;) ! — Tomica (talk) 14:37, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 22:58, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
Comments –
- I see that a couple of the paragraphs have been merged since the last FLC. I think the two current paragraphs are now overly long, and preferred the old four-paragraph lead, which I think had better-sized paragraphs.
- In the second paragraph, there's one usage of ref 7 after an en dash that doesn't come immediately after punctuation. In this case, the best solution is to place the citation before the dash, immediately after "chart". Giants2008 (Talk) 21:16, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Done all. Thanks for your comments Giants :) — ΛΧΣ21™ 02:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.