Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gary Sinise on stage
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 May 2010 at 21:15:03 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f3/Gary_Sinise_on_stage_1_crop.jpg/385px-Gary_Sinise_on_stage_1_crop.jpg)
- Reason
- This is a featured picture on commons that is used in a couple of WP articles.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Gary Sinise, Lt. Dan Band
- FP category for this image
- People
- Creator
- Dschwen (Daniel Schwen)
- Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:15, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry Tony, his face is uncomfortable, and his hand is in an awkward spot, the image looks awkward altogether. --Iankap99 (talk) 21:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Far to harsh lighting to make the picture FP quality... — raeky (talk | edits) 01:42, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I find the lighting isn’t bad. However, the overall composition and the subject matter lends to a “snapshot-look” to it. Greg L (talk) 02:10, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Weak support: I've got to say I disagree with the above. The lighting's not too bad, the pose isn't terrible and I like the composition. Not absolutely stunning, but I'm happy to weakly support. J Milburn (talk) 15:13, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral: I agree with the comments by J Milburn. It's a good picture, but is it good enough to be a featured picture? Haljackey (talk) 19:06, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support I like the sharpness, colors, bokeh, off-center composition and EV of this. I agree the lighting is rather harsh and uneven on his face, but for this type of shot, the photographer has little control over it. And barring any kind of Wikipedian paparazzi that can follow Sinise around, replacements may be hard to come by. Fletcher (talk) 00:31, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- Weak support basically per Fletcher. The lighting is a bit harsh and the man himself looks a bit weary and ragged here, additionally I guess he's not really noted as a musician, which leads me to 'weak', but we don't have unlimited opportunities for images of this type either. --jjron (talk) 17:45, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Not promoted --Jujutacular T · C 21:23, 25 May 2010 (UTC)