Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Battleships of Italy/archive1

Battleships of Italy

List of battleships of Italy

26 articles

Ammiraglio di Saint Bon class

Ammiraglio di Saint Bon

Emanuele Filiberto

Regina Margherita class

Regina Margherita

Benedetto Brin

Regina Elena class

Regina Elena

Vittorio Emanuele

Roma

Napoli

Dante Alighieri

Conte di Cavour class

Conte di Cavour

Giulio Cesare

Leonardo da Vinci

Andrea Doria class

Andrea Doria

Caio Duilio

Francesco Caracciolo class

Littorio class

Littorio

Vittorio Veneto

Impero

Roma

This topic is a joint effort between user:Sturmvogel_66 and me over the past few years, and it is of course a component of WP:OMT. It's actually been complete for quite some time, but I haven't gotten around to putting it up here until now. The topic details all of the pre-dreadnought and dreadnought battleships built or planned by Italy from the 1890s to the 1940s. Thanks for reviewing the topic. Parsecboy (talk) 16:52, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

• Support - another amazing OMT topic. --PresN 17:48, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
• Director Comment - This nomination has been going on for nearly a month with only one vote for support. There needs to be more discussion here so we can get a consensus or this will have to be closed as failed. GamerPro64 15:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
• Support - per PresN. Hamish59 (talk) 13:09, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
• Question - FT or GT? An amazing amount of work has gone into this. Do I read the criteria correctly that it says 50% have to be Featured level? Maybe I missed something in the criteria? — Maile (talk) 16:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

• A GT - there is no separate WP:Good topic candidates, so all nominations fall under the "Featured topic candidates/[title]" format. Parsecboy (talk) 16:41, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

• Support - I see that now. Well, I reiterate that this is an amazing amount of work since 2013. I've reviewed each article, and I support. — Maile (talk) 16:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
• Support - good representatives of what consistency in a topic should look like among the different articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llammakey (talk • contribs) 13:42, 10 September 2015
• Support. Topic appears complete, and meets the criteria. All editors involved have done an incredible job here, and should be proud of this accomplishment. Great work. – Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 02:27, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
• Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic. - GamerPro64 16:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)