Wikipedia:Peer review/CornerShot/archive1

CornerShot

I think it is Good Article quality, but I want to know what my peers think before nominating it. I know it could use more info around the standard gun's section. Does anyone else see anything else wrong with the article? Gang sta EB (sliding logs~dive logs) 13:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

by Jon513

The word new in the first sentences doesn't make any sense in an encyclopedia. Imagine if you were reading and old Britannica and it says a cotton gin is a new invention! Remove it or consider replacing it with "invented in whatever year".
All of the pictures on the page are copyrighted and a fair use rational for all of them is questionable considering that the page it a bit crowded with pictures. I recommend removing all the picture except for one and put it in an {{Infobox Weapon}} (see Uzi submachine gun)
This article fits into more categories, start by looking at other guns and see what categories they are in.
The references should be change to a {{cite web}} or {{cite news}} as appropriate.
In general more reliable sources are need (a joke forum!)
While there is no need to repeat everything said in Urban warfare there should be some discussion on the need to create such a weapon.

The preceding review was by Jon513 on 16:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is too many forms to just put in infobox weapon. Gang sta EB (sliding logs~dive logs) 16:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are also variants of the Uzi. Jon513 05:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 14:09, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]