Wikipedia:Peer review/Ganoga Lake/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
This article grew out of a reflink in Waterfalls in Ricketts Glen State Park, which is an FA. I've listed it for peer review because I think it is close to ready for FAC, and I am tired of waiting for a GA reviewer (since Feb. 23). Thanks to Dincher for his review, more comments are welcome. Thanks in advance, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 18:34, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Arsenikk has just passed this as a GA with more useful comments, which I will address today. I would still appreciate a PR before FAC. Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 12:25, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- I know this is an amazingly unhelpful thing to say at Peer Review, but I don't have any major comments on this extremely interesting article, except to say that perhaps more could be said about leisure/fishing activities on the lake. Other than that I can't see any room for further improvement and if this came up at FAC I would vote unconditional support. Please let me know when it is taken there, and if the creators have any other articles up for review let me know as I would be happy to (and greatly enjoy) reviewing them as well.--Jackyd101 (talk) 01:07, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comments - the main problem with more sources on the lake is that it is privately owned (I have never laid eyes on it myself as they have a gate up on the access road). If it were public (in a state park or state forest or state game land) then there would almost certainly be more on modern recreation available. Since three reviewers have found very little to complain about, I think I will nominate it FAC soon. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 01:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)