Wikipedia:Peer review/Labrador Retriever/archive1
Appearance
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for June 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
This article has been a WP:GA for a while now, listing it here to get some feedback on how it can be improved further. Cirt (talk) 06:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- Notices posted to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dogs and Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board. Cirt (talk) 06:13, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments by Dodo bird
- Many references to breeders' sites and general pet sites. Some seems authoritative but I doubt most meet the WP:RS standard.
- The lead is too short.
- Appearance: Should start with a broad description of the dog, and then mention breed standards and differences between standards and field/show lines. Right now, the article only states what they should look like and the differences between field and show lines, but don't actually describe the breed in general.
- I think "History" should be the first section.