Wikipedia:Peer review/Loss (comic)/archive1

Loss (comic)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I want to nominate this article to Featured Article status and want to see what should be done to get it to that status. GamerPro64 00:27, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Z1720

Hi GamerPro64, I'm sorry that it has taken a month to get a review for this article, and I thank you for your patience. I will review this as if it was an FAC. Consider me a non-expert.

"Parodies of the strip became more and more abstract," -> "Parodies of the strip became more abstract"
The article's last sentence needs a citation.
Know Your Meme is not considered a reliable source, so it will probably be challenged at the FAC. If you want to include it, ensure you have an answer to "Why is this a high-quality reliable source?"
I am concerned about the lack of sources in the article; this will not disqualify an article for featured article status, but it will make its success more difficult. Consider looking for more sources in the databases at WP:LIBRARY, Google Scholar, Google Books, and in databases available at your local library or post-secondary alumni association. WP:RS/P and WP:VG/RS might also have additional sources.
I also recommend that you speak with someone who has brought comic articles or similar topics to FAC; they might help describe areas that could be expanded upon or included in the article.

Sorry that I can't give more advice. Let me know if you have any questions. Z1720 (talk) 22:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GamerPro64 making sure you saw these comments. Z1720 (talk) 20:37, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I saw them. I was waiting for my FAC for another article to get done to focus on this. GamerPro64 20:50, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]