Wikipedia:Peer review/Operation Brevity/archive2
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for June 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I am unsure weather or not the article will stand up the scrutiny of a FA review.
The article has just been passed its A-Class review, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Operation Brevity, however grammar was brought up as one of the issues which may temporally delay the article from being upgraded to FA.
I have gone through the article having a mess around sorting out mistakes I have spotted however it would be great if another pair of eyes or two could scan the article and sort out any remaining grammatical screw ups.
Thanks, EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 11:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- I've had a, quick and brief, look through the article and fixed some grammatical errors that immediately sprung up at me, but I think I noticed a further few lurking there. Overall it's a very good article, and there are relatively few errors for the information displayed. I have also changed a few of the title headings; 'Plans' didn't seem very specific to anything and 'German reactions' should personally have been more representative of the Axis forces, and not just those of the Germans.
If you'd like me to have a detailed look through I might be persuaded to! MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 18:28, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Ealdgyth (talk · contribs)
- You said you wanted to know what to work on before taking to FAC, so I looked at the sourcing and referencing with that in mind. I reviewed the article's sources as I would at FAC.
- I'm not familiar with http://warlinks.com/armour/11_hussars/index.html? Is this considered a reliable source?
- You need to resolve the citation needed tag in the lead.
- Hope this helps. Please note that I don't watchlist Peer Reviews I've done. If you have a question about something, you'll have to drop a note on my talk page to get my attention. (My watchlist is already WAY too long, adding peer reviews would make things much worse.) 14:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Guys, just like to thank you for your comments. Sorry for the late reply but i havent really been around for the last few weeks. Cheers for the help.--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 08:44, 15 July 2008 (UTC)