Wikipedia:Peer review/Sword Art Online/archive1

Sword Art Online[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because, given how popular the series is, and how well-written the article is, I feel that, with just a little more work, the article is ready for GA status. I'm requesting feedback on how GA status can be attained.

Thanks, Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks well written but there are something that could be explained like in the light novels section where the reader might not understand the word dōjinshi. Also, the manga's last sentence is unsourced. In anime, the theme songs could be taken to the episode list. Lastly, weren't the light novels licensed for English release? Since they are the primary media, I think critical reception about them could be added. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I would suggest you to go to the main peer review page and exchange reviews User:Narutolovehinata5.Tintor2 (talk) 23:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Due to there being no activity in this peer review for a while, I'm closing this discussion. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]