Wikipedia:Peer review/Truman Capote/archive1
Although I have not edited this page yet, it is only because I think it is a fantastic article. I am fairly new, but this seems to meet standards for Featured Article status. Can anyone with more experience please correct me if I'm wrong, and offer any suggestions as to what needs improvement if it isn't at FA quality yet? One thing I am concerned about is the multimedia links at the bottom. It's not part of a standard encyclopedia, nor does it really fit WP policy, but they are well-chosen links, and I am inclined to keep them, as anyone who needs information about Capote would probably like them. Also, other online encyclopedias (Britannica, I believe, is one of them) often include multimedia links. Goyston (talk) (contribs) 00:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 23:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- It's not even remotely close to WP:WIAFA - have a look at WP:LEAD, WP:MSH, WP:NOT, and WP:EL, and the article needs to be thoroughly cited - see WP:CITE. After you cite the article, clean up the section headings, write the lead and prune the External links, I suggest submitting it for GA, then another peer review, before contemplating WP:FAC. Kroger Babb is a recent FA you might compare to. Good luck! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:28, 31 January 2007 (UTC)